ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2022
Testing awareness in focal seizures: Clinical practice and interpretation of current guidelines.
Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- A practical guide to the updated seizure classification 2025.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2025Guideline
- Updated classification of epileptic seizures: Position paper of the International League Against Epilepsy.Epilepsia · 2025Article
- Modulating limbic circuits in temporal lobe epilepsy: impacts on seizures, memory, mood and sleep.Brain communications · 2025Article
- Automatic responsiveness testing in epilepsy with wearable technology: The ARTiE Watch.Epilepsia · 2025Article
- Slow and fast cortical cholinergic arousal is reduced in a mouse model of focal seizures with impaired consciousness.Cell reports · 2024Article
- Novel KCNQ2 missense variant expands the genotype spectrum of DEE7.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024Article
- Evaluating consciousness and awareness during focal seizures: responsiveness testing versus recall testingEpileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) classification of focal seizures uses recall of experiences post-ictally to assess for awareness and not ictal responsiveness to external stimuli, stating that responsiveness is often not tested. We investigated how clinicians assess for seizure awareness by administering an online survey. We found that most respondents use both responsiveness and recall to assess for awareness in the clinic (78%) and in the epilepsy monitoring unit (72%). Furthermore, 60% of respondents believe that the ILAE recommends using both measures. Given our results, we believe that using both responsiveness and recall would provide a more practical classification of impaired consciousness in focal seizures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.