Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35484977›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2022

Anti-spike IgG antibody kinetics following the second and third doses of BNT162b2 vaccine in nursing home residents.

Helene Jeulin, Carlos Labat, Kevin Duarte, Simon Toupance, Gregoire Nadin, Denis Craus, Ioannis Georgiopoulos, Isabelle Gantois, François Goehringer, Athanase Benetos

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Helene JeulinUniversité de Lorraine, CNRS, LCPME, Nancy, France.
Carlos LabatUniversité de Lorraine, INSERM, DCAC, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Kevin DuarteUniversité de Lorraine, INSERM, CHRU-Nancy Brabois, Centre d'Investigation Clinique Pluridisciplinaire (CIC-P) 14-33, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Simon ToupanceUniversité de Lorraine, INSERM, DCAC, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Gregoire NadinSorbonne Université, CNRS, LJLL, Paris, France.
Denis CrausMaison Médicale, Rosières-aux-Salines, France.
Ioannis GeorgiopoulosUniversité de Lorraine, CHRU-Nancy Brabois, Department of Clinical Geriatrics, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Isabelle GantoisUniversité de Lorraine, CHRU-Nancy Brabois, Department of Clinical Geriatrics, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
François GoehringerUniversité de Lorraine, CHRU-Nancy Brabois, Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Athanase BenetosUniversité de Lorraine, INSERM, DCAC, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5197-1515
Défaillance Cardiovasculaire Aiguë et ChroniqueUniversité de Lorraine · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInserm · FR

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-15-IDEX-04-LUE
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuration of post-vaccination protection against COVID-19 in nursing home (NH) residents is a critical issue. The objective of this study was to estimate the duration of the IgG(S) response to the mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine in NH residents with (COV-Yes) or without (COV-No) history of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

methodsA 574 COV-Yes and COV-No NH residents were included in 2 cohorts: Main (n = 115, median age 87 years) or Confirmatory (n = 459, median age 89 years). IgG(S) quantification was carried out at three different time points following the BNT162b2 vaccine: three (1st) and seven (2nd) months after the 2nd dose, and 1 month after the 3rd dose (3rd quantification) in the Main cohort, and twice (2nd and 3rd) in the Confirmatory cohort. The seroneutralization capacity according to COVID-19 history was also measured in a subgroup of patients.

resultsNeutralization capacity was strongly correlated with IgG(S) levels (R CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In old subjects living in NH, history of SARS-CoV-2 infection provides a clear advantage in the magnitude and duration of high IgG(S) titers following the 2nd dose. Importantly, the 3rd dose induces a much more pronounced IgG(S) response than the 2nd dose in COV-No subjects, the effect of which should be able to ensure a prolonged protection against severe forms of COVID-19 in these subjects.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesAged, 80 and overAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineHumansImmunoglobulin GNursing HomesRNA, MessengerSARS-CoV-2Antibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineImmunoglobulin GRNA, MessengerVaccinesnursing homesSARS-CoV-2vaccination

Identifiers

PMID35484977
PMCPMC9115082
OpenAlexW4225122509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.