ArticleBiophysical journal2022
Deep-learning-based 3D cellular force reconstruction directly from volumetric images.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Guidance for 3D traction force microscopy today and in the next decade.Nature methods · 2026Review
- A new friend for measuring forces in living tissues.Biophysical journal · 2025Article
- Perspectives: Comparison of deep learning segmentation models on biophysical and biomedical data.Biophysical journal · 2025Article
- Inferring cellular contractile forces and work using deep morphology traction microscopy.Biophysical journal · 2024Article
- 3D Traction Force Microscopy in Biological Gels: From Single Cells to Multicellular Spheroids.Annual review of biomedical engineering · 2024Review
- High-Throughput Electromechanical Coupling Chip Systems for Real-Time 3D Invasion/Migration Assay of Cells.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The forces exerted by single cells in the three-dimensional (3D) environments play a crucial role in modulating cellular functions and behaviors closely related to physiological and pathological processes. Cellular force microscopy (CFM) provides a feasible solution for quantifying mechanical interactions, which usually regains cellular forces from deformation information of extracellular matrices embedded with fluorescent beads. Owing to computational complexity, traditional 3D-CFM is usually extremely time consuming, which makes it challenging for efficient force recovery and large-scale sample analysis. With the aid of deep neural networks, this study puts forward a novel, data-driven 3D-CFM to reconstruct 3D cellular force fields directly from volumetric images with random fluorescence patterns. The deep-learning-based network is established through stacking deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN) and specific function layers. Some necessary physical information associated with constitutive relation of extracellular matrix material is coupled to the data-driven network. The mini-batch stochastic-gradient-descent and back-propagation algorithms are introduced to ensure its convergence and training efficiency. The networks not only have good generalization ability and robustness but also can recover 3D cellular forces directly from the input fluorescence image pairs. Particularly, the computational efficiency of the deep-learning-based network is at least one to two orders of magnitude higher than that of traditional 3D-CFM. This study provides a novel scheme for developing high-performance 3D-CFM to quantitatively characterize mechanical interactions between single cells and surrounding extracellular matrices, which is of vital importance for quantitative investigations in biomechanics and mechanobiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.