Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35484601›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2022

A pragmatic implementation research study for In Our DNA SC: a protocol to identify multi-level factors that support the implementation of a population-wide genomic screening initiative in diverse populations.

Caitlin G Allen, Daniel P Judge, Elissa Levin, Katherine Sterba, Kelly Hunt, Paula S Ramos, Cathy Melvin, Karen Wager, Kenneth Catchpole, Catherine Clinton and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Caitlin G AllenDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. allencat@musc.edu.
Daniel P JudgeDivision of Cardiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Elissa LevinClinical & Policy, Helix, San Mateo, CA, USA.
Katherine SterbaDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Kelly HuntDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Paula S RamosDepartment of Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Cathy MelvinDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Karen WagerDepartment of Healthcare Leadership and Management, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Kenneth CatchpoleAnesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Catherine ClintonClinical & Policy, Helix, San Mateo, CA, USA.
Marvella FordHollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Lori L McMahonOffice of Vice President for Research, Department of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Leslie LenertBiomedical Informatics Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.

Funding

South Carolina Cancer Disparities Research Center (SC CADRE)U54CA210962 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI TURNER, DAVID PAUL · 2017 to 2023
$6.7M
South Carolina Cancer Disparities Research Center (SC CaDRe)U54CA210963 · NCI · SOUTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, MARVELLA ELIZABETH, SALLEY, JUDITH · 2017 to 2023
$6.1M
Improving Family Cancer History Collection using Social Network, Human Centered Design, and Implementation Science ApproachesK00CA253576 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI ALLEN, CAITLIN GLOECKNER · 2020 to 2024
$443k
NCI NIH HHS K00 CA253576NCI NIH HHS U54 CA210962NCI NIH HHS U54 CA210963
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2021, the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) partnered with Helix, a population genetic testing company, to offer population-wide genomic screening for Centers for Disease Control and Preventions' Tier 1 conditions of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, Lynch syndrome, and familial hypercholesterolemia to 100,000 individuals in South Carolina. We developed an implementation science protocol to study the multi-level factors that influence the successful implementation of the In Our DNA SC initiative.

methodsWe will use a convergent parallel mixed-methods study design to evaluate the implementation of planned strategies and associated outcomes for In Our DNA SC. Aims focus on monitoring participation to ensure engagement of diverse populations, assessing contextual factors that influence implementation in community and clinical settings, describing the implementation team's facilitators and barriers, and tracking program adaptations. We report details about each data collection tool and analyses planned, including surveys, interview guides, and tracking logs to capture and code work group meetings, adaptations, and technical assistance needs. DISCUSSION: The goal of In Our DNA SC is to provide population-level screening for actionable genetic conditions and to foster ongoing translational research. The use of implementation science can help better understand how to support the success of In Our DNA SC, identify barriers and facilitators to program implementation, and can ensure the sustainability of population-level genetic testing. The model-based components of our implementation science protocol can support the identification of best practices to streamline the expansion of similar population genomics programs at other institutions.

Indexed as

Health services researchImplementation sciencePopulation-based genomic screening

Identifiers

PMID35484601
PMCPMC9052691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.