Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35484597›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2022

Simulation CT-based radiomics for prediction of response after neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Pierluigi Bonomo, Jairo Socarras Fernandez, Daniela Thorwarth, Marta Casati, Lorenzo Livi, Daniel Zips, Cihan Gani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Pierluigi BonomoRadiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Jairo Socarras FernandezSection for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Daniela ThorwarthSection for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Marta CasatiMedical Physics, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Lorenzo LiviRadiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Daniel ZipsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Cihan GaniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. Cihan.Gani@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
University of Tübingen · DEAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITUniversity of Florence · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo report on the discriminative ability of a simulation Computed Tomography (CT)-based radiomics signature for predicting response to treatment in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemo-radiation for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the rectum.

methodsConsecutive patients treated at the Universities of Tübingen (from 1/1/07 to 31/12/10, explorative cohort) and Florence (from 1/1/11 to 31/12/17, external validation cohort) were considered in our dual-institution, retrospective analysis. Long-course neoadjuvant chemo-radiation was performed according to local policy. On simulation CT, the rectal Gross Tumor Volume was manually segmented. A feature selection process was performed yielding mineable data through an in-house developed software (written in Python 3.6). Model selection and hyper-parametrization of the model was performed using a fivefold cross validation approach. The main outcome measure of the study was the rate of pathologic good response, defined as the sum of Tumor regression grade (TRG) 3 and 4 according to Dworak's classification.

resultsTwo-hundred and one patients were included in our analysis, of whom 126 (62.7%) and 75 (37.3%) cases represented the explorative and external validation cohorts, respectively. Patient characteristics were well balanced between the two groups. A similar rate of good response to neoadjuvant treatment was obtained in in both cohorts (46% and 54.7%, respectively; p = 0.247). A total of 1150 features were extracted from the planning scans. A 5-metafeature complex consisting of Principal component analysis (PCA)-clusters (whose main components are LHL Grey-Level-Size-Zone: Large Zone Emphasis, Elongation, HHH Intensity Histogram Mean, HLL Run-Length: Run Level Variance and HHH Co-occurence: Cluster Tendency) in combination with 5-nearest neighbour model was the most robust signature. When applied to the explorative cohort, the prediction of good response corresponded to an average Area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.65 ± 0.02. When the model was tested on the external validation cohort, it ensured a similar accuracy, with a slightly lower predictive ability (AUC of 0.63).

conclusionsRadiomics-based, data-mining from simulation CT scans was shown to be feasible and reproducible in two independent cohorts, yielding fair accuracy in the prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemo-radiation.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyRectal NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyHumansRectumRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedChemotherapyPathologic responseRadiomicsRadiotherapyRectal cancerSimulation computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID35484597
PMCPMC9052564
OpenAlexW4225121780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.