Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35484590›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2022

E-Learning during COVID-19: perspectives and experiences of the faculty and students.

Sisi Li, Chunhui Zhang, Qijun Liu, Kuang Tong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sisi LiCenter for Teaching and Learning Development, Southern Medical University, Shatai Road 1023, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Chunhui ZhangOffice of Academic Affairs, Southern Medical University, Baiyun District, Shatai Road 1023, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Qijun LiuCenter for Teaching and Learning Development, Southern Medical University, Shatai Road 1023, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Kuang TongOffice of Academic Affairs, Southern Medical University, Baiyun District, Shatai Road 1023, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China. ktong78@163.com.

Funding

The 13th Five-year Plan of Education in Guangdong Province: The Construction and Practice of an Integrated Model of Science Pedagogy and Holistic Education in Higher Education 2020GXJK436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAimed to corroborate students' and faculty's experiences with e-learning during the current pandemic.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted from February to June 2020. Seven surveys were distributed electronically to all undergraduate students and the faculty (4 to students and 3 to teachers) at the Southern Medical University (China). Descriptive statistics and t-tests were used to analyze the data. Statistical significance was set at p < .05.

resultsMost students had some exposure to e-learning prior to the all e-learning regiment, contrasted with close to 90% of teachers having no or very limited experience. Students' perceptions of the most helpful e-learning activities did not change significantly overall (Week 3 vs. Week 9). Approaching 60% of students (Week 9) did find online discussion/Q&A/forum helpful, an increase from less than 30% (Week 3). Among teachers, gaps emerged (Week 9) between e-teaching activities used and their perceived effectiveness. Despite pre-recorded lectures being the most frequently used method, the least gap was associated with live-stream lectures-the least used. Over time, teacher's perceived effectiveness of e-teaching vs. in-person teaching did not differ significantly overall. When the results among students (Week 7) and teachers (Week 9) were corroborated, a slightly higher percentage of teachers viewed online teaching to be less effective than in-person teaching and a slightly higher percentage of teachers viewed online teaching as far less effective. For preferred learning modes after the resumption of in-person learning, students' preferences did not differ significantly overall (Week 3 vs. week 9). Surveys conducted in Week 9 found that a slightly higher percentage of students (~ 70%) than teachers (~ 60%) preferred some forms of hybrid learning and a lower percentage of students preferred face-to-face learning only. Approximately three quarters of teachers responded that at least 50% of course materials could be mastered by students on their own.

conclusionsOverall, the perceived effectiveness of e-learning among students and teachers has not changed significantly over time. Nor have students' preferences shifted significantly for various learning modes after the in-person learning resumed. However, informative directional trends have emerged. Our research illustrates empirically the need to corroborate students' and instructors' experiences over time to inform more holistic improvements of e-learning.

Indexed as

Computer-Assisted InstructionCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesFacultyHumansStudentsCOVID-19E-learningFacultyMedical studentMedical universityPerceived effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID35484590
PMCPMC9046707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.