Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35484547›Full record

SynthesisBMC pulmonary medicine2022

Probiotic in the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill patients: evidence from meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Yue-Chen Sun, Chen-Yi Wang, Hai-Li Wang, Yao Yuan, Jian-Hong Lu, Lei Zhong

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The spectrum of pneumonia among intubated neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yue-Chen SunDepartment of Emergency, Huzhou Central Hospital, Affiliated Central Hospital HuZhou University, Huzhou, 313000, Zhejiang Province, China.
Chen-Yi WangDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Ningbo Yinzhou No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo, 315000, Zhejiang Province, China.
Hai-Li WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Huzhou Central Hospital, Affiliated Central Hospital HuZhou University, Huzhou, 313000, Zhejiang Province, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0310-8143
Yao YuanDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Ningbo Yinzhou No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo, 315000, Zhejiang Province, China.
Jian-Hong LuDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Huzhou Central Hospital, Affiliated Central Hospital HuZhou University, No. 1558, North Sanhuan Road, Huzhou, 313000, Zhejiang Province, China.
Lei ZhongDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Huzhou Central Hospital, Affiliated Central Hospital HuZhou University, No. 1558, North Sanhuan Road, Huzhou, 313000, Zhejiang Province, China. perfecticu@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0208-1823
Huzhou Central Hospital · CNNingbo No. 2 Hospital · CN

Funding

The Science and Technology Program of Huzhou 2020GY19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProbiotic might have a role in the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) among mechanically ventilated patients, but the efficacy and safety remained inconsistent. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of probiotic (prebiotic, synbiotic) versus placebo in preventing VAP in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation.

methodsPubMed, Embase and the Cochrane library databases were searched to 10 October 2021 without language restriction for randomized or semi-randomized controlled trials evaluating probiotic (prebiotic, synbiotic) vs. placebo in prevention of VAP in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients. The pooled relative risk (RR) along with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were combined using a random-effects model. Furthermore, the trial sequential analysis (TSA) and subgroup analyses were performed. Statistical significance was regarded as P < 0.05.

resultsTwenty-three trials involving 5543 patients were eligible for this meta-analysis. The combined RR of decreasing the risk of VAP by probiotic was 0.67 (0.56, 0.81) for all eligible studies, 0.69 (n = 5136; 95% CI = 0.57 to 0.84; P < 0.01) for adults studies and 0.55 (n = 407; 95%CI = 0.31 to 0.99; P = 0.046) for neonates/children studies. Additionally, the above-mentioned positive finding in 20 adults studies was verified by the results of TSA, subgroup analyses and cumulative meta-analysis. Ample evidences demonstrated a 31% decrease in RR of incidence of VAP was noted when prophylactic probiotic therapy was administrated among adult patients. Finally, there were no effects on the ICU/hospital/28-/90-day mortality, bacteremia, CRBSI, diarrhea, ICU-acquired infections, infectious complications, pneumonia, UTI and wound infection between two groups (P > 0.05 for all).

conclusionsBased on the results of our study, the current evidences suggested that prophylactic administration of probiotic might be utilized as a preventive method for VAP in neonates/children and adults patients who required mechanical ventilation. However, further large, high-quality RCTs are warranted to assess the efficacy and safety of probiotic treatment in critically ill patients, especially for the neonates/children studies and the long-term consequences of this therapy.

Indexed as

Pneumonia, Ventilator-AssociatedProbioticsChildCritical IllnessHumansInfant, NewbornRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRespiration, ArtificialCritically ill patientsPrebioticProbioticSynbioticVentilator-associated pneumonia

Identifiers

PMID35484547
PMCPMC9052689
OpenAlexW4225331172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.