Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35484505›Full record

SynthesisBMC nephrology2022

The effect of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors on continuous and binary kidney outcomes in subgroups of patients with diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Noor Alsalemi, Cheryl A Sadowski, Naoual Elftouh, Maudeline Louis, Kelley Kilpatrick, Sherilyn K D Houle, Jean-Philippe Lafrance

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC nephrology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Management of Hypertension in Diabetic Kidney Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Noor AlsalemiDépartement de Pharmacologie et Physiologie, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Cheryl A SadowskiFaculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Naoual ElftouhCentre de Recherche de L'Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, Canada.
Maudeline LouisCentre de Recherche de L'Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, Canada.
Kelley KilpatrickCentre de Recherche de L'Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, Canada.
Sherilyn K D HouleSchool of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Jean-Philippe LafranceDépartement de Pharmacologie et Physiologie, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada. jean-philippe.lafrance@umontreal.ca.
Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont · CAMcGill University · CAUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Waterloo · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDiabetic nephropathy is the leading cause of kidney failure. Clinical practice guidelines recommend prescribing renin-angiotensin aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) to prevent diabetic nephropathy at any stage. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the effects of RAASi with placebo and other antihypertensive agents in adults with diabetes on continuous and binary kidney outcomes to provide a comprehensive review of the class effect of RAASi on several subgroups.

methodsA systematic electronic search to identify randomized clinical trials of a duration of ≥ 12 months that recruited ≥ 50 adult participants with type 1 or 2 diabetes with any stage of chronic kidney disease and proteinuria was conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Cochrane library with no language restriction. Studies were screened against the inclusion and exclusion criteria by two reviewers independently.

resultsIn this meta-analysis, evidence was drawn from 26,551 patients with diabetes from 46 studies. Our analysis shows that RAASi were better than placebo in reducing SrCr (the raw mean difference [RMD] = -13.4 μmol/L; 95%CI: -16.78; -10.01) and albuminuria levels (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -1; 95%CI: -1.57, -0.44, I

conclusionWhile our findings revealed the non-superiority of RAASi over other antihypertensives and portrayed a class effect on several subgroups of study participants, it raised a challenging question on whether RAASi deserve their place as first-line therapy in managing diabetic nephropathy.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic NephropathiesRenal InsufficiencyAdultAlbuminuriaAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAntihypertensive AgentsFemaleHumansKidneyMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRenin-Angiotensin SystemAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAntihypertensive AgentsAngiotensin aldosterone system inhibitorsDiabetes mellitusDiabetic nephropathyMeta-analysisReninSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35484505
PMCPMC9052620
OpenAlexW4224989443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.