Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35484500›Full record

Observational studyBMC geriatrics2022

Gut microbiota alterations in critically ill older patients: a multicenter study.

Mesa Victoria, Valdés-Duque Beatriz Elena, Giraldo-Giraldo Nubia Amparo, Jailler-R Ana María, Giraldo-Villa Adriana, Acevedo-Castaño Irene, Yepes-M Mónica Alejandra, Barbosa-Barbosa Janeth, Agudelo-Ochoa Gloria María

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC geriatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Pain Interference in End Stage Kidney Disease is Associated with Changes in Gut Microbiome Features Before and After Kidney Transplantation.Pain management nursing : official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mesa VictoriaFood and Human Nutrition Research Group, Universidad de Antioquia (UdeA), Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia. victoriamesa@gmail.com.
Valdés-Duque Beatriz ElenaBiosciences Research Group, Institución Universitaria Colegio Mayor de Antioquia, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.
Giraldo-Giraldo Nubia AmparoFood and Human Nutrition Research Group, Universidad de Antioquia (UdeA), Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.
Jailler-R Ana MaríaDepartment of Nutrition, Hospital San Vicente Fundación, Rionegro, Antioquia, Colombia.
Giraldo-Villa AdrianaDepartment of Nutrition, Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.
Acevedo-Castaño IreneDepartment of Nutrition, Hospital General de Medellín, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.
Yepes-M Mónica AlejandraDepartment of Nutrition, Hospital San Vicente Fundación, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.
Barbosa-Barbosa JanethDepartment of Nutrition, Clínica Las Américas, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.
Agudelo-Ochoa Gloria MaríaFood and Human Nutrition Research Group, Universidad de Antioquia (UdeA), Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAging generates changes in the gut microbiota, affecting its functionality. Little is known about gut microbiota in critically ill older adults. The objective of this study was to describe the profile of gut microbiota in a cohort of critically ill older adults.

methodsThis observational study was conducted in five health institutions. Over a 6-month study period, critically ill patients over 18 years old who were admitted to the intensive care unit were enrolled. Fecal microbiota profiles were determined from 155 individuals, over 60 years old (n = 72) and under 60 years old (n = 83). Gut microbiota was analyzed by sequencing the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. Alpha and beta diversity, operational taxonomic units and the interaction of gut microbiota with variables under study were analyzed. Amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) specifically associated with age were recovered by including gender, discharge condition, BMI, ICU stay and antibiotics as covariates in a linear mixed model.

resultsIn older adults, sepsis, malnutrition, antibiotic prescription and severity (APACHE and SOFA scores) were higher than in the group under 60 years of age. Alpha diversity showed lower gut microbiota diversity in those over 60 years of age (p < 0.05); beta diversity evidenced significant differences between the groups (PERMANOVA = 1.19, p = 0.038). The microbiota of the adults under 60 years old showed greater abundance of Murdochiella, Megasphaera, Peptoniphilus and Ezakiella, whereas those over 60 years old Escherichia-Shigella and Hungatella were more abundant.

conclusionThe gut microbial community was altered by different factors; however, age significantly explained the variability in critically ill patients. A lower presence of beneficial genera and a higher abundance of pathogens was observed in adults over 60 years old.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsCritical IllnessFecesHumansMiddle AgedRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAnti-Bacterial AgentsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SCritically illDysbiosisGut microbiotaICUOlder adultsSepsis

Identifiers

PMID35484500
PMCPMC9047279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.