Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35484386›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Alterations in intestinal microbiota in ultramarathon runners.

Mika Sato, Yoshio Suzuki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Genomics and physiology ofMicrobial genomics · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mika SatoJuntendo University Graduate School of Health and Sports Science, 1-1, Hiragagakuendai, Inzai, Chiba, 270-15, Japan.
Yoshio SuzukiJuntendo University Graduate School of Health and Sports Science, 1-1, Hiragagakuendai, Inzai, Chiba, 270-15, Japan. yssuzuki@juntendo.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0003-4982-5591

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date, only one study has reported changes in the gut microbiome of an ultramarathon runner before and after competing in the race. Herein we aimed to investigate changes in intestinal microbiota in nine ultramarathon runners. Eight of the nine participants ran 96.102 km (up 8062 m, down 6983 km) and one ran 99.12 km (up 8448 m, down 7369 m) within 38-44 h. Intestinal microbiota alterations were examined at three timepoints: before (Pre), after (Post), and 10 days after (Recovery) the race. The α- and β-diversity of intestinal microbiota were unaffected by the race. Six of the nine participants showed the B-type enterotype, while the remaining three showed the P-type enterotype; however, significant difference between enterotypes was not observed in the influence of the ultramarathon on intestinal microbiota. The abundance of mean Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, was significantly decreased from 2.9% (Pre) to 1.6% (Post), as well as other three butyrate producing bacteria. One participant with the largest decrease in F. prausnitzii abundance (- 85.7%) reported sluggishness and shallow sleep from Post to Recovery. Our findings revealed that the abundance of butyrate-producing bacteria is decreased in ultramarathon runners, which consequently decreases butyrate levels in the intestine and affects host immune function.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeButyratesFaecalibacterium prausnitziiHumansButyrates

Identifiers

PMID35484386
PMCPMC9050700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.