Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35484322›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Immunology2022

Disentangling the relative importance of T cell responses in COVID-19: leading actors or supporting cast?

Stephen J Kent, David S Khoury, Arnold Reynaldi, Jennifer A Juno, Adam K Wheatley, Eva Stadler, E John Wherry, James Triccas, Sarah C Sasson, Deborah Cromer and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 142 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Detection of ongoing asymptomaticFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephen J KentDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne at The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. skent@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8539-4891
David S KhouryKirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2663-1551
Arnold ReynaldiKirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5529-5542
Jennifer A JunoDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne at The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9072-1017
Adam K WheatleyDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne at The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5593-9387
Eva StadlerKirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5129-8180
E John WherryInstitute for Immunology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0477-1956
James TriccasSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Sarah C SassonKirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Deborah CromerKirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Miles P DavenportKirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia. m.davenport@unsw.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4751-1831
UNSW Sydney · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUThe University of Sydney · AUTranslational Therapeutics (United States) · US

Funding

Virology CoreU19AI082630 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI RAYMOND T CHUNG, GEORG Michael LAUER · 2009 to 2026
$48.1M
Synergies among inhibitory receptors in tolerance, cancer & antiviral immunityP01AI108545 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Dario AA Vignali · 2015 to 2026
$30.8M
Modeling HIV CAR-T cell trafficking and persistence in Non-Human PrimatesU19AI149680 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI RILEY, JAMES L. · 2020 to 2024
$13.2M
Temporal control of differentiation and epigenetics of Exhausted CD8 T cells by ToxR01AI155577 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI WHERRY, E. JOHN · 2020 to 2024
$2.7M
Cellular and transcriptional control of exhausted CD8 T cells lineage dynamicsR01AI105343 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI WHERRY, E. JOHN · 2014 to 2017
$1.6M
NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI108545NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI105343NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI155577NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI082630NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI149680
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid development of multiple vaccines providing strong protection from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has been a major achievement. There is now compelling evidence for the role of neutralizing antibodies in protective immunity. T cells may play a role in resolution of primary SARS-CoV-2 infection, and there is a widely expressed view that T cell-mediated immunity also plays an important role in vaccine-mediated protection. Here we discuss the role of vaccine-induced T cells in two distinct stages of infection: firstly, in protection from acquisition of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection following exposure; secondly, if infection does occur, the potential for T cells to reduce the risk of developing severe COVID-19. We describe several lines of evidence that argue against a direct impact of vaccine-induced memory T cells in preventing symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, the contribution of T cell immunity in reducing the severity of infection, particularly in infection with SARS-CoV-2 variants, remains to be determined. A detailed understanding of the role of T cells in COVID-19 is critical for next-generation vaccine design and development. Here we discuss the challenges in determining a causal relationship between vaccine-induced T cell immunity and protection from COVID-19 and propose an approach to gather the necessary evidence to clarify any role for vaccine-induced T cell memory in protection from severe COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Antibodies, NeutralizingCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansAntibodies, NeutralizingCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID35484322
PMCPMC9047577
OpenAlexW4225011156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.