ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2022
MRI Findings after Recent Image-Guided Lumbar Puncture: The Rate of Dural Enhancement and Subdural Collections.
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- β-Trace Protein as a Potential Biomarker for CSF-Venous Fistulas.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Direct pseudomeningocele contrast injection for spinal CSF leak localization.The neuroradiology journal · 2024Article
- Spontaneous intracranial hypotension: Exploring the viability of non-contrast FLAIR as a substitute for contrast-enhanced T1WI in assessing pachymeningeal thickening.Neuroradiology · 2024Article
- Intracranial findings in spontaneous intracranial hypotension: Does the severity of abnormalities correspond with certainty and/or multifocality of cerebrospinal fluid leaks?The neuroradiology journal · 2024Article
- Diagnosis and Management of Pineal Germinoma: From Eye to Brain.Eye and brain · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeThe rate of abnormal intracranial MR imaging findings including subdural collections and dural enhancement after recent lumbar puncture is not known. The purpose of our study was to examine the intracranial MR imaging findings after recent image-guided lumbar puncture. MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients who underwent contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the brain within 7 days of a CT-guided lumbar puncture between January 2014 and April 2021 were included. Contrast-enhanced MR images were reviewed for diffuse dural enhancement, morphologic findings of brain sag, dural venous sinus distension, and subdural collections.
resultsOf the 160 patients who met the inclusion criteria, only 6 patients (3.9%) had new diffuse dural enhancement, though none had dural enhancement when the MR imaging was within 2 days of lumbar puncture. All 6 patients with dural enhancement had small, concurrent subdural collections. Two additional patients had subdural collections, for a total of 5.2% of our population.
conclusionsOur study is the first to examine intracranial MR imaging after recent lumbar puncture and has 2 key findings: First, 5.2% of patients had small, bilateral subdural collections after recent lumbar puncture, suggesting that asymptomatic subdural collections after recent lumbar puncture are not atypical and do not require further work-up. Additionally, when MR imaging was performed within 2 days of lumbar puncture, none of our patients had diffuse dural enhancement. This argues against the commonly held practice of performing MR imaging before lumbar puncture to avoid findings of dural enhancement, and should not delay diagnostic work-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.