Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35483908›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2022

MRI Findings after Recent Image-Guided Lumbar Puncture: The Rate of Dural Enhancement and Subdural Collections.

I T Mark, W P Dillon, M B Richie, J E Villanueva-Meyer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. β-Trace Protein as a Potential Biomarker for CSF-Venous Fistulas.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

I T MarkFrom the Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (I.T.M., W.P.D., J.E.V.-M.) Ian.mark@ucsf.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4036-2992
W P DillonFrom the Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (I.T.M., W.P.D., J.E.V.-M.).ORCID 0000-0002-7222-4615
M B RichieNeurology (M.B.R.), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0002-8802-7077
J E Villanueva-MeyerFrom the Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (I.T.M., W.P.D., J.E.V.-M.).ORCID 0000-0002-5910-0757
Laboratoire d’Imagerie Biomédicale · FRUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe rate of abnormal intracranial MR imaging findings including subdural collections and dural enhancement after recent lumbar puncture is not known. The purpose of our study was to examine the intracranial MR imaging findings after recent image-guided lumbar puncture. MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients who underwent contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the brain within 7 days of a CT-guided lumbar puncture between January 2014 and April 2021 were included. Contrast-enhanced MR images were reviewed for diffuse dural enhancement, morphologic findings of brain sag, dural venous sinus distension, and subdural collections.

resultsOf the 160 patients who met the inclusion criteria, only 6 patients (3.9%) had new diffuse dural enhancement, though none had dural enhancement when the MR imaging was within 2 days of lumbar puncture. All 6 patients with dural enhancement had small, concurrent subdural collections. Two additional patients had subdural collections, for a total of 5.2% of our population.

conclusionsOur study is the first to examine intracranial MR imaging after recent lumbar puncture and has 2 key findings: First, 5.2% of patients had small, bilateral subdural collections after recent lumbar puncture, suggesting that asymptomatic subdural collections after recent lumbar puncture are not atypical and do not require further work-up. Additionally, when MR imaging was performed within 2 days of lumbar puncture, none of our patients had diffuse dural enhancement. This argues against the commonly held practice of performing MR imaging before lumbar puncture to avoid findings of dural enhancement, and should not delay diagnostic work-up.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingSpinal PunctureBrainHumansSubdural SpaceTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID35483908
PMCPMC9089257
OpenAlexW4224990182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.