Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35483337›Full record

ArticleAging2022

Integrative analysis of expression, prognostic significance and immune infiltration of RFC family genes in human sarcoma.

Gen Wu, Jian Zhou, Xi Zhu, Xianzhe Tang, Jie Liu, Qiong Zhou, Ziyuan Chen, Tang Liu, Wanchun Wang, Xungang Xiao and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Gen WuDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410011, Hunan, China.
Jian ZhouDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410011, Hunan, China.
Xi ZhuDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich 81377, Germany.
Xianzhe TangDepartment of Orthopedics, Chenzhou No.1 People's Hospital, Chenzhou 423000, Hunan, China.
Jie LiuDepartment of Cardiology, The Fourth Hospital of Changsha, Changsha 410006, Hunan, China.
Qiong ZhouDepartment of Cardiology, The Fourth Hospital of Changsha, Changsha 410006, Hunan, China.
Ziyuan ChenDepartment of Orthopedics, The First People's Hospital of Changde City, Changde 415003, Hunan, China.
Tang LiuDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410011, Hunan, China.
Wanchun WangDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410011, Hunan, China.
Xungang XiaoDepartment of Orthopedics, Chenzhou No.1 People's Hospital, Chenzhou 423000, Hunan, China.
Tong WuDepartment of Emergency, The First Hospital of Changsha, Changsha 410005, Hunan, China.
Central South University · CNChenzhou First People's Hospital · CNFourth Hospital of Changsha · CNSecond Xiangya Hospital of Central South University · CNLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEThe First Hospital of Changsha · CNThe First People's Hospital of Changde · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo reveal the expression and prognostic value of replication factor C family genes (RFCs) in patients with sarcoma.

resultsThe results showed that the mRNA expression levels of RFC2, RFC3, RFC4, and RFC5 were increased in sarcoma tissues. In addition, Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) dataset analysis indicated that RFC1, RFC2, RFC3, RFC4, and RFC5 were elevated expressed in sarcoma cell lines. Moreover, Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) and Kaplan-Meier Plotter showed that highly expressed RFC2-5 were associated with poor overall survival (OS) or relapse-free survival (RFS) in sarcoma patients. The results of the Tumor Immune Estimation Resource (TIMER) database indicated that the expression of RFCs was negatively correlated with the infiltration of CD4+ T cells and macrophages.

conclusionsThere were significant differences in the expression of RFCs between normal tissue and sarcoma tissue, and RFC2, RFC3, RFC4, and RFC5 might be promising prognostic biomarkers for sarcoma.

methodsThe expression of RFCs was analyzed using the ONCOMINE dataset and GEPIA dataset. CCLE dataset was used to assess the expression of RFCs in the cancer cell line. The prognostic value of RFCs was evaluated by GEPIA and Kaplan-Meier analysis. Furthermore, the association between RFCs and their co-expressed genes were explored via ONCOMINE and GEPIA datasets. We used the TIMER dataset to analyze the immune cell infiltration of RFCs in sarcoma.

Indexed as

Neoplasm Recurrence, LocalSarcomaBiomarkers, TumorGene Expression ProfilingHumansKaplan-Meier EstimatePrognosisBiomarkers, Tumorbioinformatics analysisexpressionKEGGprognosisRFC

Identifiers

PMID35483337
PMCPMC9085243
OpenAlexW4225112668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.