Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35483122›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of cell biology

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli (APC) in cell migration.

Xingyuan Fang, Tatyana M Svitkina

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of cell biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. NovelCancers · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xingyuan FangDepartment of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, United States.
Tatyana M SvitkinaDepartment of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, United States. Electronic address: svitkina@sas.upenn.edu.
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Structure and functions of the actin cytoskeletonR35GM140832 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Tatyana Svitkina · 2021 to 2026
$2.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM140832
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli (APC) protein is mostly known as a tumor suppressor that regulates Wnt signaling, but is also an important cytoskeletal protein. Mutations in the APC gene are linked to colorectal cancer and various neurological disorders and intellectual disabilities. Cytoskeletal functions of APC appear to have significant contributions to both types of these disorders. As a cytoskeletal protein, APC can regulate both actin and microtubule cytoskeletons, which together form the main machinery for cell migration. As APC is a multifunctional protein with numerous interaction partners, the complete picture of how APC regulates cell motility is still unavailable. However, some molecular mechanisms begin to emerge. Here, we review available information about roles of APC in cell migration and propose a model explaining how microtubules, using APC as an intermediate, can initiate leading edge protrusion in response to external signals by stimulating Arp2/3 complex-dependent nucleation of branched actin filament networks via a series of intermediate events.

Indexed as

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli ProteinCell MovementGenes, APCActinsHumansMicrotubulesActinsAdenomatous Polyposis Coli ProteinAPC protein, humanActinAdenomatous polyposis coliCell adhesionCell migrationCell polarityCell protrusionMicrotubules

Identifiers

PMID35483122
PMCPMC9357102
OpenAlexW4224243166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.