Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35483050›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2022

Testing the Efficacy of Attitudinal Inoculation Videos to Enhance COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance: Quasi-Experimental Intervention Trial.

Rachael Piltch-Loeb, Max Su, Brian Hughes, Marcia Testa, Beth Goldberg, Kurt Braddock, Cynthia Miller-Idriss, Vanessa Maturo, Elena Savoia

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06119854 (Brief Digital Intervention to Increase COVID-19 Vaccination Among Individuals With Anxiety or Depression), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06119854 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Brief Digital Intervention to Increase COVID-19 Vaccination Among Individuals With Anxiety or Depression

TypeinterventionalSponsorCity University of New York, School of Public HealthRan2024 to 2024Enrolled1,419ConditionsMisinformation, Vaccine Hesitancy, Anxiety, DepressionArmsAttitudinal inoculation, Cognitive-behavioral therapy-informed intervention, Conventional public health messaging
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rachael Piltch-LoebDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6813-1934
Max SuDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9337-2780
Brian HughesPolarization and Extremism Research and Innovation Lab, American University, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7069-4066
Marcia TestaDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0139-2176
Beth GoldbergJigsaw, Google LLC, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8636-6702
Kurt BraddockPolarization and Extremism Research and Innovation Lab, American University, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8480-6970
Cynthia Miller-IdrissPolarization and Extremism Research and Innovation Lab, American University, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2849-0799
Vanessa MaturoJigsaw, Google LLC, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7065-1226
Elena SavoiaDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8300-1177
Harvard University · USAmerican University · USGoogle (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, a variety of COVID-19-related misinformation has spread and been amplified online. The spread of misinformation can influence COVID-19 beliefs and protective actions, including vaccine hesitancy. Belief in vaccine misinformation is associated with lower vaccination rates and higher vaccine resistance. Attitudinal inoculation is a preventative approach to combating misinformation and disinformation, which leverages the power of narrative, rhetoric, values, and emotion.

objectiveThis study seeks to test inoculation messages in the form of short video messages to promote resistance against persuasion by COVID-19 vaccine misinformation.

methodsWe designed a series of 30-second inoculation videos and conducted a quasi-experimental study to test the use of attitudinal inoculation in a population of individuals who were unvaccinated (N=1991). The 3 intervention videos were distinguished by their script design, with intervention video 1 focusing on narrative/rhetorical ("Narrative") presentation of information, intervention video 2 focusing on delivering a fact-based information ("Fact"), and intervention video 3 using a hybrid design ("Hybrid"). Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models were used to compare the main effect of the intervention on the 3 outcome variables: ability to recognize misinformation tactics ("Recognize"), willingness to share misinformation ("Share"), and willingness to take the COVID-19 vaccine ("Willingness").

resultsThere were significant effects across all 3 outcome variables comparing inoculation intervention groups to controls. For the Recognize outcome, the ability to recognize rhetorical strategies, there was a significant intervention group effect (P<.001). For the Share outcome, support for sharing the mis- and disinformation, the intervention group main effect was statistically significant (P=.02). For the Willingness outcome, there was a significant intervention group effect; intervention groups were more willing to get the COVID-19 vaccine compared to controls (P=.01).

conclusionsAcross all intervention groups, inoculated individuals showed greater resistance to misinformation than their noninoculated counterparts. Relative to those who were not inoculated, inoculated participants showed significantly greater ability to recognize and identify rhetorical strategies used in misinformation, were less likely to share false information, and had greater willingness to get the COVID-19 vaccine. Attitudinal inoculation delivered through short video messages should be tested in public health messaging campaigns to counter mis- and disinformation.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansPandemicsSurveys and QuestionnairesVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccinesattitudinal inoculationCOVID-19COVID-19 vaccinehealth interventioninfodemiologyinterventionmisinformationpublic healthvaccinationvaccinevaccine hesitancyvaccine misinformation

Identifiers

PMID35483050
PMCPMC9217150
OpenAlexW4225125704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.