Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35482492›Full record

ArticlePain medicine (Malden, Mass.)2022

Changes in Opioid Dispensing by Medical Specialties After the Release of the 2016 CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain.

Phillip P Salvatore, Gery P Guy, Christina A Mikosz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. CDC Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Pain - United States, 2022.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2022
    Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The burden of acute pain in the U.S. in the wake of the opioid crisis.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  13. Postoperative Opioid Consumption After Discharge: An Update From the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative Registry.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Phillip P SalvatoreEpidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.ORCID 0000-0001-8305-9056
Gery P GuyDivision of Overdose Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Christina A MikoszDivision of Overdose Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify changes in opioid prescribing across a diverse array of medical specialties after the release of the 2016 CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain.

designInterrupted time-series analysis of data from a commercial prescribing database. SUBJECTS: De-identified recipients of opioid prescriptions dispensed at U.S. retail pharmacies between 2015 and 2019.

methodsOpioid dispensing data were obtained from the IQVIA Longitudinal Prescription (LRx) database, representing more than 800 million opioid prescriptions. Monthly dispensing rates, dosage in morphine milligram equivalents (MME), and mean prescription duration were calculated across 29 medical specialties. Changes in dispensing after the release of the 2016 CDC Guideline were assessed through interrupted time-series analysis.

resultsDeclining trends in opioid dispensing accelerated in 24 of 29 specialty groups after the release of the CDC Guideline (P < 0.05 for 15 groups). Decreases were greatest among family medicine clinicians, where declines accelerated by 4.4 prescriptions per month per 100,000 persons (P = 0.005), and surgeons, where declines accelerated by 3.6 prescriptions per month per 100,000 (P = 0.003).

conclusionsThese results illustrate that clinicians likely to provide primary care exhibited the greatest decreases in opioid dispensing. However, specialties outside the scope of the CDC Guideline (e.g., surgery) also exhibited accelerated decreases in prescribing. These declines illustrate that specialties beyond primary care could have interest in evaluating opioid prescribing practices, supporting the importance of specialty-specific guidance that balances the individualized risks and benefits of opioids and the role of non-opioid treatments.

Indexed as

Chronic PainMedicineAnalgesics, OpioidCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.Drug PrescriptionsHumansPractice Patterns, Physicians'United StatesAnalgesics, OpioidDrug PrescriptionInterrupted Time-Series AnalysisOpioidPhysicians’Practice GuidelinesPractice PatternsSpecialization

Identifiers

PMID35482492
PMCPMC11034837
OpenAlexW4225088403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.