Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35482395›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of clinical oncology2022

Tumor mutational burden measurement using comprehensive genomic profiling assay.

Hidenori Kage, Shinji Kohsaka, Kenji Tatsuno, Toshihide Ueno, Masachika Ikegami, Koichi Zokumasu, Aya Shinozaki-Ushiku, Sumimasa Nagai, Hiroyuki Aburatani, Hiroyuki Mano and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Hidenori KageNext-Generation Precision Medicine Development Laboratory, Graduate School of Medicine, The University Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3658-4442
Shinji KohsakaDivision of Cellular Signaling, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenji TatsunoGenome Science Division, RCAST, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshihide UenoDivision of Cellular Signaling, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Masachika IkegamiDivision of Cellular Signaling, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Koichi ZokumasuDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Aya Shinozaki-UshikuDivision of Integrative Genomics, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Sumimasa NagaiDepartment of Medical Development, Institute for Advancement of Clinical and Translational Science (iACT), Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Hiroyuki AburataniGenome Science Division, RCAST, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyuki ManoDivision of Cellular Signaling, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Katsutoshi OdaDivision of Integrative Genomics, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2468-9573
Center for Genomic Science · ITInstitute of Genomics and Integrative Biology · INEngineering Advancement Association of Japan · JPJuntendo University Hospital · JPUniversity of Tokyo Hospital · JP

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development JP19mk0102145
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTumors with a high number of mutations in the genome, or tumor mutational burden, are presumed to be more likely to respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, the optimal method to calculate tumor mutational burden using comprehensive genomic profiling assays is unknown.

methodsTodai OncoPanel is a dual panel of a deoxyribonucleic acid panel and a ribonucleic acid panel. Todai OncoPanel deoxyribonucleic acid panel version 6 is an improvement over version 3 with increased number of targeted genes and limited targeting of intronic regions. We calculated tumor mutational burden measured by Todai OncoPanel deoxyribonucleic acid panel versions 3 and 6 using three different calculation methods: all mutations within the targeted region (target tumor mutational burden), all mutations within the coding region (all coding tumor mutational burden) and non-synonymous mutations (non-synonymous coding tumor mutational burden). We then compared them with whole exosome sequencing tumor mutational burden. In addition, 16 lung cancer patients whose samples were analyzed using Todai OncoPanel deoxyribonucleic acid version 3 were treated with anti-PD-1 or PD-L1 antibody monotherapy.

resultsWhen compared with whole exosome sequencing tumor mutational burden as the standard, tumor mutational burden measured by Todai OncoPanel deoxyribonucleic acid version 3 resulted in accuracy of 71% for all three calculation methods. In version 6, accuracy was 96% for target tumor mutational burden and all coding tumor mutational burden and 91% for non-synonymous coding tumor mutational burden. Patients with either partial response or stable disease had higher non-synonymous coding tumor mutational burden (6.7/Mb vs. 1.6/Mb, P = 0.02) and higher PD-L1 expression (40% vs. 3%, P = 0.01) and a trend toward higher target tumor mutational burden (9.2/Mb vs. 2.4/Mb, P = 0.09) compared with patients with progressive disease.

conclusionsIncrease in targeted gene number and limiting intronic regions improved tumor mutational burden measurement by Todai OncoPanel when compared with whole exosome sequencing tumor mutational burden. Target tumor mutational burden may be the method of choice to measure tumor mutational burden.

Indexed as

B7-H1 AntigenLung NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorDNAGenomicsHumansMutationTumor BurdenB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorDNAcancer genegenomicsimmune checkpoint inhibitorsmutationtumor mutational burden

Identifiers

PMID35482395
OpenAlexW4225100500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.