Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35482375›Full record

ArticleJMIR nursing2022

Normalizing Telemonitoring in Nurse-Led Care Models for Complex Chronic Patient Populations: Case Study.

Kayleigh Gordon, Katie N Dainty, Carolyn Steele Gray, Jane DeLacy, Amika Shah, Emily Seto

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05543720 (Nurse-led Integrated Care of Complex Patients Facilitated By Telemonitoring), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05543720 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Nurse-led Integrated Care of Complex Patients Facilitated By Telemonitoring: The Safe, Managed, and Responsive Transitions (SMaRT) Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Health Network, TorontoRan2022 to 2026Enrolled350ConditionsHeart Failure,Congestive, Mental Health (Depression), Diabetes Mellitus, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseArmsMedly
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kayleigh GordonInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5953-8214
Katie N DaintyInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2906-8813
Carolyn Steele GrayInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2146-0001
Jane DeLacyWilliam Osler Health System, Brampton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4719-1388
Amika ShahInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8615-2683
Emily SetoInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8723-5915

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe implementation of telemonitoring (TM) has been successful in terms of the overall feasibility and adoption in single disease care models. However, a lack of available research focused on nurse-led implementations of TM that targets patients with multiple and complex chronic conditions (CCC) hinders the scale and spread to these patient populations. In particular, little is known about the clinical perspective on the implementation of TM for patients with CCC in outpatient care.

objectiveThis study aims to better understand the perspective of the clinical team (both frontline clinicians and those in administrative positions) on the implementation and normalization of TM for complex patients in a nurse-led clinic model.

methodsA pragmatic, 6-month implementation study was conducted to embed multicondition TM, including heart failure, hypertension, and diabetes, into an integrated nurse-led model of care. Throughout the study, clinical team members were observed, and a chart review was conducted of the care provided during this time. At the end of the study, clinical team members participated in qualitative interviews and completed the adapted Normalization Measure Development questionnaires. The Normalization Process Theory guided the deductive data analysis.

resultsOverall, 9 team members participated in the study as part of a larger feasibility study of the TM program, of which 26 patients were enrolled. Team members had a shared understanding of the purpose and value of TM as an intervention embedded within their practice to meet the diverse needs of their patients with CCC. TM aligned well with existing chronic care practices in several ways, yet it changed the process of care delivery (ie, interactional workability subconstruct). Effective TM normalization in nurse-led care requires rethinking of clinical workflows to incorporate TM, relationship development between the clinicians and their patients, communication with the interdisciplinary team, and frequent clinical care oversight. This was captured well through the subconstructs of skill set workability, relational integration, and contextual integration of the Normalization Process Theory.

conclusionsClinicians successfully adopted TM into their everyday practice such that some providers felt their role would be significantly and negatively affected without TM. This study demonstrated that smartphone-based TM systems complemented the routine and challenging clinical work caring for patients with CCC in an integrated nurse-led care model.

Indexed as

CCCclinical teamcomplex chronic conditionsdiseasedisease care modelintegrated caremobile phonemodels of careNP-led carenursenurse-led implementationnurse practitionertelemonitoringTM

Identifiers

PMID35482375
PMCPMC9100369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.