Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35482368›Full record

ReviewJMIR mental health2022

Data Visualization for Chronic Neurological and Mental Health Condition Self-management: Systematic Review of User Perspectives.

Ashley Polhemus, Jan Novak, Shazmin Majid, Sara Simblett, Daniel Morris, Stuart Bruce, Patrick Burke, Marissa F Dockendorf, Gergely Temesi, Til Wykes

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JMIR mental health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. VIEWER: an extensible visual analytics framework for enhancing mental healthcare.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Ashley PolhemusMerck Research Labs, Information Technology, Merck, Sharpe, & Dohme, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5056-5785
Jan NovakMerck Research Labs, Information Technology, Merck, Sharpe, & Dohme, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5545-2723
Shazmin MajidMerck Research Labs, Information Technology, Merck, Sharpe, & Dohme, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1061-6525
Sara SimblettInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8075-8238
Daniel MorrisInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5118-7344
Stuart BruceRADAR-CNS Patient Advisory Board, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7895-0581
Patrick BurkeRADAR-CNS Patient Advisory Board, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2547-6374
Marissa F DockendorfGlobal Digital Analytics and Technologies, Merck, Sharpe, & Dohme, Kenilworth, NJ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6341-0221
Gergely TemesiMerck Research Labs, Information Technology, Merck, Sharpe, & Dohme, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3423-2200
Til WykesInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5881-8003
King's College London · GBMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USMSD (Austria) · ATNational Health Service · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRemote measurement technologies (RMT) such as mobile health devices and apps are increasingly used by those living with chronic neurological and mental health conditions. RMT enables real-world data collection and regular feedback, providing users with insights about their own conditions. Data visualizations are an integral part of RMT, although little is known about visualization design preferences from the perspectives of those living with chronic conditions.

objectiveThe aim of this review was to explore the experiences and preferences of individuals with chronic neurological and mental health conditions on data visualizations derived from RMT to manage health.

methodsIn this systematic review, we searched peer-reviewed literature and conference proceedings (PubMed, IEEE Xplore, EMBASE, Web of Science, Association for Computing Machinery Computer-Human Interface proceedings, and the Cochrane Library) for original papers published between January 2007 and September 2021 that reported perspectives on data visualization of people living with chronic neurological and mental health conditions. Two reviewers independently screened each abstract and full-text article, with disagreements resolved through discussion. Studies were critically appraised, and extracted data underwent thematic synthesis.

resultsWe identified 35 eligible publications from 31 studies representing 12 conditions. Coded data coalesced into 3 themes: desire for data visualization, impact of visualizations on condition management, and visualization design considerations. Data visualizations were viewed as an integral part of users' experiences with RMT, impacting satisfaction and engagement. However, user preferences were diverse and often conflicting both between and within conditions.

conclusionsWhen used effectively, data visualizations are valuable, engaging components of RMT. They can provide structure and insight, allowing individuals to manage their own health more effectively. However, visualizations are not "one-size-fits-all," and it is important to engage with potential users during visualization design to understand when, how, and with whom the visualizations will be used to manage health.

Indexed as

data visualizationdigital healthmental healthneurologyremote measurement technologyuser-centered design

Identifiers

PMID35482368
PMCPMC9100378
OpenAlexW4225105538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.