Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35482186›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Machine Learning-driven Protein Library Design: A Path Toward Smarter Libraries.

Mehrsa Mardikoraem, Daniel Woldring

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mehrsa MardikoraemDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Daniel WoldringDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA. woldring@egr.msu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteins are small yet valuable biomolecules that play a versatile role in therapeutics and diagnostics. The intricate sequence-structure-function paradigm in the realm of proteins opens the possibility for directly mapping amino acid sequence to function. However, the rugged nature of the protein fitness landscape and an astronomical number of possible mutations even for small proteins make navigating this system a daunting task. Moreover, the scarcity of functional proteins and the ease with which deleterious mutations are introduced, due to complex epistatic relationships, compound the existing challenges. This highlights the need for auxiliary tools in current techniques such as rational design and directed evolution. To that end, the state-of-the-art machine learning can offer time and cost efficiency in finding high fitness proteins, circumventing unnecessary wet-lab experiments. In the context of improving library design, machine learning provides valuable insights via its unique features such as high adaptation to complex systems, multi-tasking, and parallelism, and the ability to capture hidden trends in input data. Finally, both the advancements in computational resources and the rapidly increasing number of sequences in protein databases will allow more promising and detailed insights delivered from machine learning to protein library design. In this chapter, fundamental concepts and a method for machine learning-driven library design leveraging deep sequencing datasets will be discussed. We elaborate on (1) basic knowledge about machine learning algorithms, (2) the benefit of machine learning in library design, and (3) methodology for implementing machine learning in library design.

Indexed as

Machine LearningProteinsAlgorithmsDatabases, ProteinGene LibraryProteinsDeep learningDirected evolutionLibrary designMachine learning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.