ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022
Site-wise Diversification of Combinatorial Libraries Using Insights from Structure-guided Stability Calculations.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many auspicious clinical and industrial accomplishments have improved the human condition by means of protein engineering. Despite these achievements, our incomplete understanding of the sequence-structure-function relationship prevents rapid innovation. To tackle this problem, we must develop and integrate new and existing technologies. To date, directed evolution and rational design have dominated as protein engineering principles. Even so, prior to screening for novel or improved functions, a large collection of variants, within a protein library, exist along an ambiguous mutational terrain. Complicating things further, the choice of where to initialize investigation along a vast sequence space becomes even more difficult given that the majority of any sequence lacks function entirely. Unfortunately, even when considering functionally relevant positions, random substitutions can prove to be destabilizing, causing a hindrance to an otherwise function-inducing, stability-reliant folding process. To enhance productivity in the field, we seek to address this issue of destabilization, and subsequent disfunction, at protein-protein and protein-ligand interacting regions. Herein, the process of choosing amenable positions - and amino acids at those positions - allows for a refined, knowledge-based approach to combinatorial library design. Using structural data, we perform computational stability prediction with FoldX's PositionScan and Rosetta's ddG_monomer in tandem, allowing for the refinement of our thermodynamic stability data through the comparison of results. In turn, we provide a process for selecting in silico predicted mutually stabilizing positions and avoiding overly destabilizing ones that guides the site-wise diversification of combinatorial libraries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35482184What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.