Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35482163›Full record

ReviewArchives of microbiology2022

Microbial adaptation and impact into the pesticide's degradation.

Sajjad Ahmad, Hafiz Waqas Ahmad, Pankaj Bhatt

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Isolation and characterization of a thermophilicFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mosquito Gut Microbiota: A Review.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 5 countries.

Sajjad AhmadKey Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management of Crop in South China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs; Key Laboratory of Natural Pesticide and Chemical Biology, Ministry of Education, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, People's Republic of China.
Hafiz Waqas AhmadDepartment of Food Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, 38000, Pakistan.
Pankaj BhattDepartment of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47906, USA. pankajbhatt.bhatt472@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0356-5715
Purdue University West Lafayette · USSouth China Agricultural University · CNUniversity of Agriculture Faisalabad · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The imprudent use of agrochemicals to control agriculture and household pests is unsafe for the environment. Hence, to protect the environment and diversity of living organisms, the degradation of pesticides has received widespread attention. There are different physical, chemical, and biological methods used to remediate pesticides in contaminated sites. Compared to other methods, biological approaches and their associated techniques are more effective, less expensive and eco-friendly. Microbes secrete several enzymes that can attach pesticides, break down organic compounds, and then convert toxic substances into carbon and water. Thus, there is a lack of knowledge regarding the functional genes and genomic potential of microbial species for the removal of emerging pollutants. Here we address the knowledge gaps by highlighting systematic biology and their role in adaptation of microbial species from agricultural soils with a history of pesticide usage and profiling shifts in functional genes and microbial taxa abundance. Moreover, by co-metabolism, the microbial species fulfill their nutritional requirements and perform more efficiently than single microbial-free cells. But in an open environment, free cells of microbes are not much prominent in the degradation process due to environmental conditions, incompatibilities with mechanical equipment and difficulties associated with evenly distributing inoculum through the agroecosystem. This review highlights emerging techniques involving the removal of pesticides in a field-scale environment like immobilization, biobed, biocomposites, biochar, biofilms, and bioreactors. In these techniques, different microbial cells, enzymes, natural fibers, and strains are used for the effective biodegradation of xenobiotic pesticides.

Indexed as

Environmental PollutantsPesticidesAcclimatizationBiodegradation, EnvironmentalSoilEnvironmental PollutantsPesticidesSoilCo-metabolic pathwayMicrobial degradationPesticidesToxicityWastewater treatment

Identifiers

PMID35482163
OpenAlexW4225107302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.