ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2022
Development of novel models for predicting mismatch repair protein deficiency and relevant disease-free survival in colorectal cancer patients.
Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Carcinoembryonic Antigen Expression in Human Tumors: A Tissue Microarray Study on 13,725 Tumors.Cancers · 2024Article
- Association of Microsatellite Instability and Gene Expression Profile in Colorectal Carcinoma and Potential Implications for Therapy.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeDNA mismatch repair (MMR) protein deficiency has attached more attention for its potential to be a biomarker of immunotherapy for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. However, clinical models involving the expression status of MMR protein are rare. Herein, we sought to develop two clinical models (a diagnostic model for the prediction of MMR status and a prognostic model for the prediction of disease-free survival) for CRC patients.
methodsA total of 582 CRC patients were finally included. There were 53 patients with deficient expression of MMR protein. The differences between the deficient MMR (dMMR) group and the proficient MMR (pMMR) group were analyzed.
resultsCompared to pMMR patients, those with dMMR status were younger and had better pathological features (depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, pathological stage, perineuronal invasion, and PLT level) and disease-free survival (DFS). The tumor location of the left colon, adenocarcinoma, and abnormal PLT level were identified as the independent predictors for pMMR. Based on these data, we developed the diagnostic model using Logistic regression analysis. It showed a satisfactory accuracy (AUC = 82.3% in the derivate set; AUC = 73.6% in the validation set). Furthermore, pMMR, poorer differentiation, perineuronal invasion, distant metastasis, lower hemoglobin level, and abnormal CEA level were established as the independent prognostic factors of poorer DFS. Based on them, a prognostic model with valuable performance (1-year AUC = 75.5%/3-year AUC = 76.9% in the derivate set; 1-year AUC = 72.3%/3-year AUC = 73.8% in the validation set) was developed.
conclusionsOur diagnostic and prognostic models could identify CRC patients at risk for pMMR protein expression and disease recurrence. It may contribute to improving the diagnosis and treatment of CRC patients at an individual level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.