Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35481935›Full record

Trial reportIndoor air2022

Portable air cleaners and residential exposure to SARS-CoV-2 aerosols: A real-world study.

Nirmala T Myers, Robert J Laumbach, Kathleen G Black, Pamela Ohman-Strickland, Shahnaz Alimokhtari, Alicia Legard, Adriana De Resende, Leonardo Calderón, Frederic T Lu, Gediminas Mainelis and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Indoor air, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Managing infectious aerosols to counter engineered pandemics: Current recommendations and future research.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID-19: a systematic review on environmental control measures.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA on air purifier filters in university spaces without symptomatic or confirmed cases.Aerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Air Change Rate and SARS-CoV-2 Exposure in Hospitals and Residences: A Meta-Analysis.Aerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nirmala T MyersDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2473-9497
Robert J LaumbachRutgers Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4350-3674
Kathleen G BlackRutgers Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1165-4304
Pamela Ohman-StricklandRutgers Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7877-7125
Shahnaz AlimokhtariRutgers Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.
Alicia LegardRutgers Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.
Adriana De ResendeRutgers Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.
Leonardo CalderónDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8163-3736
Frederic T LuRutgers Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1373-4869
Gediminas MainelisDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5837-0413
Howard M KipenRutgers Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6608-3126
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES005022 · NIEHS · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI BRIAN T BUCKLEY · 1988 to 2026
$47.4M
New Jersey Alliance for Clinical Translational Science: NJ ACTSUL1TR003017 · NCATS · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL/HEALTH SCIENCES-RBHS · PI PANETTIERI, REYNOLD ALEXANDER · 2019 to 2023
$28.9M
TRAINING IN EVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGYT32ES007148 · NIEHS · RUTGERS THE ST UNIV OF NJ NEW BRUNSWICK · PI Lauren M Aleksunes · 1987 to 2026
$11.4M
ACL HHS T42OH008422NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES005022NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007148NIH/CATS UL1TR003017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals with COVID-19 who do not require hospitalization are instructed to self-isolate in their residences. Due to high secondary infection rates in household members, there is a need to understand airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 within residences. We report the first naturalistic intervention study suggesting a reduction of such transmission risk using portable air cleaners (PACs) with HEPA filters. Seventeen individuals with newly diagnosed COVID-19 infection completed this single-blind, crossover, randomized study. Total and size-fractionated aerosol samples were collected simultaneously in the self-isolation room with the PAC (primary) and another room (secondary) for two consecutive 24-h periods, one period with HEPA filtration and the other with the filter removed (sham). Seven out of sixteen (44%) air samples in primary rooms were positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA during the sham period. With the PAC operated at its lowest setting (clean air delivery rate [CADR] = 263 cfm) to minimize noise, positive aerosol samples decreased to four out of sixteen residences (25%; p = 0.229). A slight decrease in positive aerosol samples was also observed in the secondary room. As the world confronts both new variants and limited vaccination rates, our study supports this practical intervention to reduce the presence of viral aerosols in a real-world setting.

Indexed as

Air Pollution, IndoorCOVID-19AerosolsHumansRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2Single-Blind MethodAerosolsRNA, ViralAirborne transmissionAir change rateCOVID-19 pandemicCOVID-19 symptomsPTFE filter virus samplingSARS-CoV-2 aerosols

Identifiers

PMID35481935
PMCPMC9111720
OpenAlexW4224281048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.