Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35481898›Full record

ArticleJournal of Crohn's & colitis2022

Diagnostic Performance of Magnetic Resonance Enterography Disease Activity Indices Compared with a Histological Reference Standard for Adult Terminal Ileal Crohn's Disease: Experience from the METRIC Trial.

Shankar Kumar, Thomas Parry, Sue Mallett, Gauraang Bhatnagar, Andrew Plumb, Shaun Walsh, Nigel Scott, Ruchi Tandon, Heung Chong, John du Parcq and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Crohn's & colitis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Shankar KumarCentre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5945-8791
Thomas ParryCentre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK.
Sue MallettCentre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK.
Gauraang BhatnagarCentre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK.
Andrew PlumbCentre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK.
Shaun WalshDepartment of Pathology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK.
Nigel ScottDepartment of Histopathology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Ruchi TandonDepartment of Cellular Pathology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Heung ChongDepartment of Cellular Pathology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
John du ParcqDepartment of Cellular Pathology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Adrianna MartinezDepartment of Cellular Pathology, St Mark's Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Morgan MoorghenDepartment of Cellular Pathology, St Mark's Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Manuel Rodriguez-JustoDepartment of Histopathology, University College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5007-1761
Steve HalliganCentre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK.
Stuart A TaylorCentre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6765-8806
METRIC study investigators
The Folklore Society · GBUniversity College London · GBLondon North West Healthcare NHS Trust · GBSt George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBNinewells Hospital · GBOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity College Hospital · GB

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsThe simplified magnetic resonance enterography [MRE] index of activity [sMARIA], London, and 'extended' London, scoring systems are widely used in Crohn's disease [CD] to assess disease activity, although validation studies have usually been single-centre, retrospective, and/or used few readers. Here, we evaluated these MRE indices within a prospective, multicentre, multireader, diagnostic accuracy trial.

methodsA subset of participants [newly diagnosed or suspected of relapse] recruited to the METRIC trial with available terminal ileal [TI] biopsies was included. Using pre-specified thresholds, the sensitivity and specificity of sMARIA, London, and 'extended' London scores for active and severe [sMARIA] TI CD were calculated using different thresholds for the histological activity index [HAI].

resultsWe studied 111 patients [median age 29 years, interquartile range 21-41, 75 newly diagnosed, 36 suspected relapse] from seven centres, of whom 22 had no active TI CD [HAI = 0], 39 mild [HAI = 1], 13 moderate [HAI = 2], and 37 severe CD activity [HAI = 3]. In total, 26 radiologists prospectively scored MRE datasets as per their usual clinical practice. Sensitivity and specificity for active disease [HAI >0] were 83% [95% confidence interval 74% to 90%] and 41% [23% to 61%] for sMARIA, 76% [67% to 84%] and 64% [43% to 80%] for the London score, and 81% [72% to 88%] and 41% [23% to 61%] for the 'extended' London score, respectively. The sMARIA had 84% [69-92%] sensitivity and 53% [41-64%] specificity for severe CD.

conclusionsWhen tested at their proposed cut-offs in a real-world setting, sMARIA, London, and 'extended' London indices achieve high sensitivity for active TI disease against a histological reference standard, but specificity is low.

Indexed as

Crohn DiseaseAdultHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyProspective StudiesRecurrenceReference StandardsRetrospective StudiesCrohn’s diseaseimagingmagnetic resonance enterography

Identifiers

PMID35481898
PMCPMC9624291
OpenAlexW4225088780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.