ArticleJournal of Crohn's & colitis2022
Diagnostic Performance of Magnetic Resonance Enterography Disease Activity Indices Compared with a Histological Reference Standard for Adult Terminal Ileal Crohn's Disease: Experience from the METRIC Trial.
Article in Journal of Crohn's & colitis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Correlation between small intestinal contrast ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging scoring systems in Crohn's disease.European radiology · 2026Article
- Magnetic resonance enterography to predict disabling disease in newly diagnosed Crohn's disease: the METRIC-EF multivariable prediction model, multicentre diagnostic inception cohort study.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2026Article
- Magnetic resonance enterography to predict subsequent disabling Crohn's disease in newly diagnosed patients (METRIC-EF)-multivariable prediction model, multicentre diagnostic inception cohort.European radiology · 2025Article
- Evaluating luminal and post-operative Crohn's disease activity on magnetic resonance enterography: A review of radiological disease activity scores.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (qMRI) of the Small Bowel in Crohn's Disease: State-of-the-Art and Future Directions.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Review
- Magnetic Resonance Enterography and Intestinal Ultrasound for the Assessment and Monitoring of Crohn's Disease.Journal of Crohn's & colitis · 2024Review
- Renal and Urological Disorders Associated With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2023Review
- Replacing Endoscopy with Magnetic Resonance Enterography for Mucosal Activity Assessment in Terminal Ileal Crohn's Disease: Are We There Yet?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsThe simplified magnetic resonance enterography [MRE] index of activity [sMARIA], London, and 'extended' London, scoring systems are widely used in Crohn's disease [CD] to assess disease activity, although validation studies have usually been single-centre, retrospective, and/or used few readers. Here, we evaluated these MRE indices within a prospective, multicentre, multireader, diagnostic accuracy trial.
methodsA subset of participants [newly diagnosed or suspected of relapse] recruited to the METRIC trial with available terminal ileal [TI] biopsies was included. Using pre-specified thresholds, the sensitivity and specificity of sMARIA, London, and 'extended' London scores for active and severe [sMARIA] TI CD were calculated using different thresholds for the histological activity index [HAI].
resultsWe studied 111 patients [median age 29 years, interquartile range 21-41, 75 newly diagnosed, 36 suspected relapse] from seven centres, of whom 22 had no active TI CD [HAI = 0], 39 mild [HAI = 1], 13 moderate [HAI = 2], and 37 severe CD activity [HAI = 3]. In total, 26 radiologists prospectively scored MRE datasets as per their usual clinical practice. Sensitivity and specificity for active disease [HAI >0] were 83% [95% confidence interval 74% to 90%] and 41% [23% to 61%] for sMARIA, 76% [67% to 84%] and 64% [43% to 80%] for the London score, and 81% [72% to 88%] and 41% [23% to 61%] for the 'extended' London score, respectively. The sMARIA had 84% [69-92%] sensitivity and 53% [41-64%] specificity for severe CD.
conclusionsWhen tested at their proposed cut-offs in a real-world setting, sMARIA, London, and 'extended' London indices achieve high sensitivity for active TI disease against a histological reference standard, but specificity is low.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.