Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35481659›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2022

Electrostatic fingerprints of catalytically active amino acids in enzymes.

Suhasini M Iyengar, Kelly K Barnsley, Rholee Xu, Aleksandr Prystupa, Mary Jo Ondrechen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Electrostatic fingerprints of catalytically active amino acids in enzymes.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Suhasini M IyengarDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Kelly K BarnsleyDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Rholee XuDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Aleksandr PrystupaDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Mary Jo OndrechenDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2456-4313

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The computed electrostatic and proton transfer properties are studied for 20 enzymes that represent all six major enzyme commission classes and a variety of different folds. The properties of aspartate, glutamate, and lysine residues that have been previously experimentally determined to be catalytically active are reported. The catalytic aspartate and glutamate residues studied here are strongly coupled to at least one other aspartate or glutamate residue and often to multiple other carboxylate residues with intrinsic pK

Indexed as

Amino AcidsHistidineAspartic AcidGlutamatesLysineStatic ElectricityAmino AcidsAspartic AcidGlutamatesHistidineLysineamino acid interactionsenzyme catalysisenzyme mechanismsprotein electrostatics

Identifiers

PMID35481659
PMCPMC8994506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.