Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35481581›Full record

SynthesisLa Medicina del lavoro2022

Duration of SARS-CoV-2 shedding and infectivity in the working age population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Alborz Rahmani, Guglielmo Dini, Veruscka Leso, Alfredo Montecucco, Bruno Kusznir Vitturi, Ivo Iavicoli, Paolo Durando

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in La Medicina del lavoro, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alborz RahmaniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa; Occupational Medicine Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy. alborz.rahmani@edu.unige.it.
Guglielmo DiniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa; Occupational Medicine Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy. guglielmo.dini@unige.it.
Veruscka LesoSection of Occupational Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy. veruscka.leso@unina.it.
Alfredo MontecuccoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa; Occupational Medicine Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino. alfredo.montecucco@edu.unige.it.
Bruno Kusznir VitturiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy. bruno.kusznir.vitturi@edu.unige.it.
Ivo IavicoliSection of Occupational Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy. ivo.iavicoli@unina.it.
Paolo DurandoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa; Occupational Medicine Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy. durando@unige.it.
Ospedale Policlinico San Martino · ITFederico II University Hospital · ITUniversity of Genoa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, working age individuals have been implicated in sustaining the resurgence of SARS-CoV-2 infections, and multiple outbreaks have been observed in several occupational settings. In this regard, Occupational Physicians play a crucial role in the management of infected workers, particularly in the safe return-to-work of subjects after clinical resolution. To this end, knowledge of the duration of the infective phase in the working age population is essential, taking into account previous evidence suggesting that PCR positivity does not coincide with virus viability.

methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis, searching major scientific databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science, were performed in order to synthesize the available evidence regarding the mean and maximal duration of infectivity compared to the mean and maximal duration of viral RNA shedding. A subgroup analysis of the studies was performed according to the immunocompetent or immunocompromised immune status of the majority of the enrolled individuals.

resultsTwenty studies were included in the final qualitative and quantitative analysis (866 individuals). Overall, a mean duration of RT-PCR positivity after symptom onset was found equal to 27.9 days (95%CI 23.3-32.5), while the mean duration of replicant competent virus isolation was 7.3 days (95%CI 5.7-8.8). The mean duration of SARS-CoV-2 shedding resulted equal to 26.5 days (95%CI 21.4-31.6) and 36.3 days (95%CI 21.9-50.6), and the mean duration of SARS-CoV-2 infectivity was 6.3 days (95%CI 4.9-7.8) and 29.5 days (95%CI 12.5-46.5), respectively considering immunocompetent and immunocompromised individuals. The maximum duration of infectivity among immunocompetent subjects was reported after 18 days from symptom onset, while in immunocompromised individuals it lasted up to 112 days.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that the test-based strategy before return-to-work might not be warranted after 21 days among immunocompetent working age individuals, and could keep many workers out of occupation, reducing their livelihood and productivity.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2HumansPandemics

Identifiers

PMID35481581
PMCPMC9073762
OpenAlexW4225081823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.