Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35481577›Full record

ArticleLa Medicina del lavoro2022

Attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination and containment measures in Italy and the role of occupational physicians.

Carlo La Vecchia, Gianfranco Alicandro, Eva Negri, Vilma Scarpino, Maurizio Coggiola, Giovanna Spatari

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in La Medicina del lavoro, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Carlo La Vecchia. carlo.lavecchia@unimi.it.
Gianfranco Alicandroa:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:32:"Istituto Nazionale di Statistica";}. gianfranco.alicandro@istat.it.
Eva Negri. eva.negri@unibo.it.
Vilma Scarpino. vilma.scarpino@bva-doxa.com.
Maurizio Coggiola. maurizio.coggiola@unito.it.
Giovanna Spatari. gspatari@unime.it.
Aims Community College · USCentro Universitário UNINOVAFAPI · BRDepartment of Physiological Sciences · RUIstituto Nazionale di Statistica · ITUniversidad Iberoamericana · DOUniversidad Mexicana · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVaccine hesitancy is the main barrier to the effective management of COVID-19. This study aims to evaluate attitudes towards vaccination and containment measures in Italy, and the role of occupational physicians in the management of COVID-19.

methodsBetween 26 and 31 January 2022, we conducted a national online survey including 1000 respondents (631 workers) representative of the Italian population. A series of questions were asked to get information on attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination, containment measures and management of COVID-19. Sampling weights were used to obtain national estimates.

resultsThe majority of respondents (92.6%) received at least two doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (or one dose of Janssen, Ad26.COV2.S), only 4.9% did not get any dose. Most interviewees (79.2%) stated that the decision to be vaccinated was their own choice, while only 4.3% were convinced by the general practitioner or the occupational physician. History of SARS-CoV-2 infection was reported by 23.9% of the participants (30.2% among workers); and 40% of the infected workers were contacted/visited by an occupational physician.

conclusionsVaccine uptake was remarkably high in Italy. Occupational physicians played a relevant role in the management of COVID-19 in occupational settings.

Indexed as

COVID-19PhysiciansAd26COVS1COVID-19 VaccinesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansItalySARS-CoV-2VaccinationAd26COVS1COVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID35481577
PMCPMC9073758
OpenAlexW4225080774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.