Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35481435›Full record

ArticlePersonality & social psychology bulletin2023

People See Political Opponents as More Stupid Than Evil.

Rachel Hartman, Neil Hester, Kurt Gray

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Personality & social psychology bulletin, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Morally offensive scientific findings activate cognitive chicanery.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rachel HartmanThe University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9714-3224
Neil HesterMcGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3025-766X
Kurt GrayThe University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USMcGill University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Affective polarization is a rising threat to political discourse and democracy. Public figures have expressed that "conservatives think liberals are stupid, and liberals think conservatives are evil." However, four studies (

Indexed as

Dissent and DisputesIntelligenceMoralsPoliticsSocial PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Statesaffective polarizationmeta-perceptionspolitical polarizationsocial perceptions

Identifiers

PMID35481435
PMCPMC10302377
OpenAlexW4225080362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.