ArticleCureus2022
Neuroendocrine Carcinoma as a Cause of Humoral Hypercalcemia of Malignancy: A Case of a Patient With Elevated Parathyroid Hormone-Related Protein.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual paraneoplastic syndrome with prostate cancer: A case of syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone (SIADH) and humoral hypercalcemia of malignancy (HHM).Urology case reports · 2025Article
- Cinacalcet increases renal calcium excretion in PTHrP-mediated hypercalcemia: a case report.BMC endocrine disorders · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Humoral hypercalcemia of malignancy (HHM) is a paraneoplastic syndrome caused by elevations in parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTH-rP). HHM often presents in patients with squamous cell carcinomas of the lung, head, and neck, as well as breast, ovarian, renal, and bladder carcinomas. HHM associated with neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is rarely observed. Here, we report a case of NEC-associated HHM refractory to standard calcium-reducing therapies but improved with the off-label addition of cinacalcet. A 31-year-old male with metastatic NEC presented to the emergency department (ED) with symptoms of nausea, emesis, constipation, and progressive weakness. He was being treated via a clinical trial at a tertiary referral center after failing standard therapies. He had recently been admitted at an outside facility for hypercalcemia, which had been managed with denosumab (120 mg subcutaneously) over the previous four weeks. He was admitted from the ED with a serum calcium of 14.6 mg/dL, potassium of 2.9 mmol/L, and phosphate of 1.2 mg/dL; ionized calcium was elevated at 8.0 mg/dL. Despite hydration and aggressive electrolyte replacement, his calcium increased to 15.5 mg/dL. Further laboratory evaluation revealed parathyroid hormone (PTH) of 6 pg/mL (10-65 pg/mL), 25-hydroxyvitamin D of 25 ng/mL (25-80 ng/mL), 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D of 513 pg/mL (18-64 pg/mL), and PTH-rP of 25 pmol/L (<2.5 pmol/L), consistent with HHM. Calcitonin was avoided due to a prior hypersensitivity reaction. He received prednisone 10 mg daily and pamidronate 90 mg IV, and his calcium improved to 11.5 mg/dL. He was discharged and investigational therapy was resumed. This therapy failed, and he did not qualify for additional cancer therapy due to refractory hypercalcemia. He was started on cinacalcet, and his calcium decreased enough to permit further cancer treatment. He had multiple hospitalizations with fluctuating calcium levels and ultimately died several months later after sustaining a subarachnoid hemorrhage from a fall. In conclusion, we report a rare case of HHM associated with NEC. While many cases of HHM are effectively managed with hydration, calcitonin, antiresorptive therapies, and glucocorticoids, some are refractory. Our patient was refractory and differed from most patients with HHM in at least two ways. As mentioned previously, NEC causing HHM is quite uncommon (~2% of cases); it is unclear, but this malignancy might predispose to refractory hypercalcemia. Our patient's elevated vitamin D may also have made his HHM more resistant to treatment. Ultimately, while not first line, cinacalcet was an effective treatment in our patient. This provides additional evidence that cinacalcet may be considered for refractory hypercalcemia secondary to malignancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.