ArticleCureus2022
Effect of Drain Output on the Timing of Closed Suction Drain (CSD) Removal After Head and Neck Surgery.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing Oncologic Head and Neck Surgery with Free Flap Reconstruction: Still a Matter of Debate.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Optimizing Surgical Drain Removal: A Narrative Review of Timing, Criteria, and Evidence-Based Practices.Cureus · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA closed suction drain (CSD) is often utilized in head and neck surgical procedures to obliterate dead space. CSDs reduce seroma and hematoma formation, thereby improving skin apposition and wound healing. The use of drains for prolonged periods of time, however, may increase the risk of wound infection. Interestingly, the evidence regarding the need for, and management of, post-operative CSDs after head and neck surgery is scarce. The current criterion of drain removal when output is less than 30 cubic centimeters (cm STUDY
designRetrospective cohort study Setting: Academic tertiary care hospital Methods: A retrospective study was performed. Patients were included if they underwent head and neck surgery at the University of Miami Hospital between January 1, 2019 and July 1, 2020 and had at least one CSD. Volume of drain output on each POD was recorded until the day of drain removal. The development of post-operative wound complications (i.e., seroma, hematoma, infection/abscess, and dehiscence) was also recorded.
resultsFrom our initial cohort of 302 patients, 145 patients met inclusion criteria. A total of 10 patients developed a post-operative wound complication. Patients had a mean age of 58.3 ± 15.0 years. The median inter-quartile range (IQR) drain output (cm
conclusionThere is no association between drain output (cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.