Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35481142›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

A Whole Leaf Comparative Study of Stomatal Conductance Models.

Gen Sakurai, Stanley J Miklavcic

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gen SakuraiInstitute for Agro-Environmental Sciences, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Tsukuba, Japan.
Stanley J MiklavcicPhenomics and Bioinformatics Research Centre, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, SA, Australia.
National Agriculture and Food Research Organization · JPUniversity of South Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We employed a detailed whole leaf hydraulic model to study the local operation of three stomatal conductance models distributed on the scale of a whole leaf. We quantified the behavior of these models by examining the leaf-area distributions of photosynthesis, transpiration, stomatal conductance, and guard cell turgor pressure. We gauged the models' local responses to changes in environmental conditions of carbon dioxide concentration, relative humidity, and light irradiance. We found that a stomatal conductance model that includes mechanical processes dependent on local variables predicts a spatial variation of physiological activity across the leaf: the leaf functions of photosynthesis and transpiration are not uniformly operative even when external conditions are uniform. The gradient pattern of hydraulic pressure which is needed to produce transpiration from the whole leaf is derived from the gradient patterns of turgor pressures of guard cells and epidermal cells and consequently leads to nonuniform spatial distribution patterns of transpiration and photosynthesis

Indexed as

leaf modelmathematical modelphotosynthesis ratestomatal conductancetranspiration rate

Identifiers

PMID35481142
PMCPMC9036488
OpenAlexW4223534263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.