Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35481114›Full record

ReviewExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2021

A systematic literature review of patient perspectives of barriers and facilitators to access, adherence, stigma, and persistence to treatment for substance use disorder.

Alina Cernasev, Kenneth C Hohmeier, Kelsey Frederick, Hilary Jasmin, Justin Gatwood

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cost per Opioid-Free Year: A Systematic Review and Summary Analysis.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. High-dose buprenorphine inductions in hospital settings.American journal of medicine open · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Induction of Medication for Opioid Use Disorder in Primary Care.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alina CernasevDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Translational Science, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Kenneth C HohmeierDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Translational Science, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Kelsey FrederickDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Translational Science, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Hilary JasminHealth Sciences Library, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
Justin GatwoodDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Translational Science, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
University of Tennessee at Knoxville · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The opioid crisis has left a devastating impact on the United States (U.S.) for over 20 years. The over-prescribing of opioid medications and availability of illicit opioids have contributed to the U.S. opioid epidemic. Given the complexity of the epidemic, substance use disorder, and its treatment, there is an urgent need for a thorough review of the qualitative literature which has captured the patient's experiences Such patient-derived qualitative data on lived experiences and perspectives may allow researchers, clinicians, and policy makers to glean new insights into addressing this epidemic. Objectives: The objective of this paper is to present a systematic literature review of the existing U.S. qualitative research and provide a patient perspective on medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), including barriers and facilitators to MOUD use. Methods: In November 2019, four electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science) were searched by a medical librarian using a combination of keywords, Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), and/or CINAHL subject headings. 8766 results were imported into EndNote, then duplicate records were removed, leaving a total of 4722 articles. The unique records were imported into Rayyan QCRI an online platform designed to expedite screening. Blinded screening was undertaken in duplicate by four reviewers. Two researchers abstracted all the articles and used thematic analysis. Results: The screening in the abstract phase excluded 4681 results, leaving 41 studies for full-text screening to determine their eligibility for inclusion in the review. After screening, 21 articles were included in the study and the analysis is based on these articles Common themes across studies included stigmatization, perceived barriers to MOUD, and MOUD treatment deserts and provider shortages. Conclusions: Qualitative research studies conducted to date have uncovered substantial MOUD treatment barriers which are both social and structural in nature. Such barriers to treatment may serve to exacerbate the current epidemic and must be taken into consideration in designing policy and treatment solutions for patients with OUD.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineMethadoneOpioid use disorderPatientQualitativeSystematic literature review

Identifiers

PMID35481114
PMCPMC9029901
OpenAlexW3170641699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.