Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35480907›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2021

Lalita Chotphruethipong, Thunwa Binlateh, Pilaiwanwadee Hutamekalin, Wanida Sukketsiri, Rotimi E Aluko, Soottawat Benjakul

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Molecular Weight Analysis of Blue Shark (International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Lalita ChotphruethipongInternational Center of Excellence in Seafood Science and Innovation, Faculty of Agro-Industry, Prince of Songkla University Hat Yai Songkhla 90110 Thailand soottawat.b@psu.ac.th.
Thunwa BinlatehDivision of Health and Applied Sciences, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University Hat Yai Songkhla 90110 Thailand.
Pilaiwanwadee HutamekalinDivision of Health and Applied Sciences, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University Hat Yai Songkhla 90110 Thailand.
Wanida SukketsiriDivision of Health and Applied Sciences, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University Hat Yai Songkhla 90110 Thailand.
Rotimi E AlukoDepartment of Food and Human Nutritional Sciences, University of Manitoba Winnipeg Manitoba R3T 2N2 Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9025-2513
Soottawat BenjakulInternational Center of Excellence in Seafood Science and Innovation, Faculty of Agro-Industry, Prince of Songkla University Hat Yai Songkhla 90110 Thailand soottawat.b@psu.ac.th.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9433-3671
Prince of Songkla University · THUniversity of Manitoba · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hydrolyzed collagen (HC) from defatted Asian sea bass skin was prepared by different enzymatic hydrolysis processes. For one-enzyme hydrolysis, papain (0.3 unit per g dry matter, DM) at 40 °C for 90 min or Alcalase (0.2 or 0.3 unit per g DM) at 50 °C for 90 min were used. The two-enzyme hydrolysis was accomplished with papain at 0.3 unit per g DM (P0.3), followed by Alcalase hydrolysis at 0.2 or 0.3 units per g DM (A0.2 or A0.3, respectively). HC prepared using the P0.3 + A0.3 process showed higher peptide yield, recovery and imino acid content in addition to stronger ABTS, DPPH radical scavenging activities and ferric reducing antioxidant power than other hydrolysis processes. HC obtained from the P0.3 + A0.3 process (at 125-500 μg mL

Identifiers

PMID35480907
PMCPMC9033432
OpenAlexW3162820369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.