ReviewApplied bionics and biomechanics2022
Efficacy and Adverse Reactions of Arthroscopic Half-Moon Plate Invasive Surgery in Patients with Acute Knee Pain (AKP): Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Applied bionics and biomechanics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retracted: Efficacy and Adverse Reactions of Arthroscopic Half-Moon Plate Invasive Surgery in Patients with Acute Knee Pain (AKP): Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Applied bionics and biomechanics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-11-29Compromised Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and adverse reactions of arthroscopic half-moon plate invasive surgery (DEB) in patients with knee pain (AKP) using meta-analysis techniques. Methods: The computer retrieves from the English databases PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science and the Chinese databases China Knowledge Network, Wanfang Database, VIP Database, and China Biomedical Literature Database to collect information about DEB therapeutic AKP randomized controlled trial. Develop criteria for documentation inclusion and exclusion, evaluate the quality and bias risk of literature, and compare differences in efficacy and adverse responses before and after DEB treatment and other conservative treatments. Results: A total of 14 randomized controlled trials and 1464 AKP patients were included in the study, with follow-up duration of 1-12 months. The total knee scores for DEB at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment were significantly better than baseline levels (1 month: WMD = 34.56, Conclusion: Compared to HA and ozone, DEB is a more effective treatment for AKP joints, while DEB is combined with HA. The clinical efficacy of injection therapy AKP is better than that of DEB alone.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.