ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2021
An in-depth examination of funded and unfunded cognitive pharmaceutical services.
Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Community Pharmacist Preferences for Providing a Dose Administration Aid Service in Australia: A Discrete Choice Experiment.PharmacoEconomics · 2026Article
- A Qualitative Evaluation of the Australian Community Pharmacy Agreement.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- What do pharmacy users think of free pharmacy services? Investigating pharmacy users' perceptions, attitudes and willingness to pay for free healthcare from pharmacies.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A substantial expansion in the scope of practice of community pharmacists has become evident over the years, with increased government remuneration pledged to support cognitive pharmaceutical services (CPS) delivery as part of the Australian Community Pharmacy Agreements. Exploring experiences in providing funded and unfunded CPS within the existing work environment will enable better understanding of community pharmacists' roles and responsibilities in delivering CPS. Objective: To explore pharmacists' roles, responsibilities, experiences, and perceived impact associated with delivering CPS. Methods: Qualitative semi-structured interviews ( Results: All participants reported an expansion of services being provided in community pharmacies. Pharmacists offered a broad range of CPS within the community pharmacy setting, via 6CPA-funded and non-6CPA or unfunded initiatives. Almost all participants reported that their pharmacy provided 6CPA-funded initiatives such as dose administration aids, clinical interventions, MedsChecks/Diabetes MedsChecks, and Home Medicines Reviews. User-pay services being offered included pharmacist-led flu vaccinations, opioid substitution therapy, sleep apnoea services, and absence from work certificates, among other services. However, profit margins on user-pay services were minimal. CPS provision was seen to have positive impacts at patient and health care system levels. Pharmacists felt they enabled timely and convenient access to health care for patients in the community pharmacy setting, and facilitated quality use of medicines, which in turn had positive impact on the community pharmacy business. Conclusions: A prominent shift in the provision of CPS was evident. Professional services provision has become the status quo for the practice of the profession, indicative of a likely shift in the work value of community pharmacists. Pharmacists should be further recognised professionally and financially for their contributions as health care professionals within the broader health care system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.