ArticleACS photonics2022
Impact of Noise and Background on Measurement Uncertainties in Luminescence Thermometry.
Article in ACS photonics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Luminescence Thermometry 2.0: Machine-Learning Temperature Read-Out with Luminescence of YOF: YbNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Overcoming the limitation: energy-gap tailoring of thermally coupled levels from ErNanoscale advances · 2026Article
- Millisecond-Delayed Fluorescence in Heavy-Halogen-Substituted TADF Emitters for Air-Pressure Sensing.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2026Article
- Autofluorescence-free ratiometric temperature monitoring with multiple emissive persistent luminescent nanothermometers.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Ratiometric Boltzmann thermometry with CrLight, science & applications · 2025Article
- Understanding the thermometric behaviour of LiLuFJournal of materials chemistry. C · 2025Article
- Operando Luminescence Thermometry for Hydrocarbon Conversion Catalysis: Dealing with Dynamic Changes in Catalyst Optical Properties.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025Article
- Multimodal Temperature Readout Boosts the Performance of CuInSACS applied materials & interfaces · 2024Article
- Article
- High-sensitivity luminescent temperature sensors: MFX:1%SmScience advances · 2024Article
- Improper Background Treatment Underestimates Thermometric Performance of Rare Earth Vanadate and Phosphovanadate Nanocrystals.ACS omega · 2024Article
- Short-wave Infrared Photoluminescence Lifetime Mapping of Rare-Earth Doped Nanoparticles Using All-Optical Streak Imaging.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Luminescence Thermometry Beyond the Biological Realm.ACS nanoscience Au · 2024Review
- Article
- Comparison of Performance between Single- and Multiparameter Luminescence Thermometry Methods Based on the MnSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Extending the dynamic temperature range of Boltzmann thermometers.Light, science & applications · 2022Article
- Less is more: dimensionality reduction as a general strategy for more precise luminescence thermometry.Light, science & applications · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Materials with temperature-dependent luminescence can be used as local thermometers when incorporated in, for example, a biological environment or chemical reactor. Researchers have continuously developed new materials aiming for the highest sensitivity of luminescence to temperature. Although the comparison of luminescent materials based on their temperature sensitivity is convenient, this parameter gives an incomplete description of the potential performance of the materials in applications. Here, we demonstrate how the precision of a temperature measurement with luminescent nanocrystals depends not only on the temperature sensitivity of the nanocrystals but also on their luminescence strength compared to measurement noise and background signal. After first determining the noise characteristics of our instrumentation, we show how the uncertainty of a temperature measurement can be predicted quantitatively. Our predictions match the temperature uncertainties that we extract from repeated measurements, over a wide temperature range (303-473 K), for different CCD readout settings, and for different background levels. The work presented here is the first study that incorporates all of these practical issues to accurately calculate the uncertainty of luminescent nanothermometers. This method will be important for the optimization and development of luminescent nanothermometers.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.