Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35480102›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

A Novel Nomogram for Prediction and Evaluation of Lymphatic Metastasis in Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Wenle Li, Bing Wang, Shengtao Dong, Chan Xu, Yang Song, Ximin Qiao, Xiaofeng Xu, Meijin Huang, Chengliang Yin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Molecular characteristics for poor prognosis related renal cell carcinoma with lymph metastases].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Wenle LiClinical Medical Research Center, Xianyang Central Hospital, Xianyang, China.
Bing WangClinical Medical Research Center, Xianyang Central Hospital, Xianyang, China.
Shengtao DongDepartment of Spine Surgery, Second Affifiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Chan XuClinical Medical Research Center, Xianyang Central Hospital, Xianyang, China.
Yang SongDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ximin QiaoClinical Medical Research Center, Xianyang Central Hospital, Xianyang, China.
Xiaofeng XuClinical Medical Research Center, Xianyang Central Hospital, Xianyang, China.
Meijin HuangDepartment of Oncology, 920th Hospital of People's Liberation Army (PLA) Joint Logistics Support Force, Yunnan, China.
Chengliang YinFaculty of Medicine, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau, Macau SAR, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lymphatic metastasis is an important mechanism of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) dissemination and is an indicator of poor prognosis. Therefore, we aimed to identify predictors of lymphatic metastases (LMs) in RCC patients and to develop a new nomogram to assess the risk of LMs. Methods: This study included patients with RCC from 2010 to 2018 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Final Results (SEER) database into the training cohort and included the RCC patients diagnosed during the same period in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University into the validation cohort. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to identify risk factors for LM, constructing a nomogram. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to assess the nomogram's performance, and the concordance index (C-index), area under curve value (AUC), and calibration plots were used to evaluate the discrimination and calibration of the nomogram. The nomogram's clinical performance was evaluated by decision curve analysis (DCA), probability density function (PDF) and clinical utility curve (CUC). Furthermore, Kaplan-Meier curves were performed in the training and the validation cohort to evaluate the survival risk of the patients with lymphatic metastasis or not. Additionally, on the basis of the constructed nomogram, we obtained a convenient and intuitive network calculator. Results: A total of 41837 patients were included for analysis, including 41,018 in the training group and 819 in the validation group. Eleven risk factors were considered as predictor variables in the nomogram. The nomogram displayed excellent discrimination power, with AUC both reached 0.916 in the training group (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.913 to 0.918) and the validation group (95% CI 0.895 to 0.934). The calibration curves presented that the nomogram-based prediction had good consistency with practical application. Moreover, Kaplan-Meier curves analysis showed that RCC patients with LMs had worse survival outcomes compared with patients without LMs. Conclusions: The nomogram and web calculator (https://liwenle0910.shinyapps.io/DynNomapp/) may be a useful tool to quantify the risk of LMs in patients with RCC, which may provide guidance for clinicians, such as identifying high-risk patients, performing surgery, and establishing personalized treatment as soon as possible.

Indexed as

lymphatic metastasismulticenternomogramrenal cell carcinoma (RCC)web calculator

Identifiers

PMID35480102
PMCPMC9035798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.