Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35480090›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2022

Robotic Endoscope Control Via Autonomous Instrument Tracking.

Caspar Gruijthuijsen, Luis C Garcia-Peraza-Herrera, Gianni Borghesan, Dominiek Reynaerts, Jan Deprest, Sebastien Ourselin, Tom Vercauteren, Emmanuel Vander Poorten

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. An Expertise Transfer Framework For Autonomous Surgical Assistance.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Rapid and robust endoscopic content area estimation: A lean GPU-based pipeline and curated benchmark dataset.Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering. Imaging & visualization · 2023
    Article
  11. Artificial intelligence and automation in endoscopy and surgery.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Caspar GruijthuijsenDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Luis C Garcia-Peraza-HerreraDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Gianni BorghesanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Dominiek ReynaertsDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Jan DeprestDepartment of Development and Regeneration, Division Woman and Child, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Sebastien OurselinDepartment of Surgical and Interventional Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Tom VercauterenDepartment of Surgical and Interventional Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Emmanuel Vander PoortenDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 203148/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many keyhole interventions rely on bi-manual handling of surgical instruments, forcing the main surgeon to rely on a second surgeon to act as a camera assistant. In addition to the burden of excessively involving surgical staff, this may lead to reduced image stability, increased task completion time and sometimes errors due to the monotony of the task. Robotic endoscope holders, controlled by a set of basic instructions, have been proposed as an alternative, but their unnatural handling may increase the cognitive load of the (solo) surgeon, which hinders their clinical acceptance. More seamless integration in the surgical workflow would be achieved if robotic endoscope holders collaborated with the operating surgeon

Indexed as

endoscope controlendoscope holdersendoscope robotsinstrument trackingminimally invasive surgeryvisual servoing

Identifiers

PMID35480090
PMCPMC9035496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.