Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35480074›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2022

Associations of dynamic driving pressure and mechanical power with postoperative pulmonary complications-posthoc analysis of two randomised clinical trials in open abdominal surgery.

Michiel T U Schuijt, Liselotte Hol, Sunny G Nijbroek, Sanchit Ahuja, David van Meenen, Guido Mazzinari, Sabrine Hemmes, Thomas Bluth, Lorenzo Ball, Marcelo Gama-de Abreu and 3 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02148692 nacompletednot on this map

Protective Ventilation With Higher Versus Lower PEEP During General Anesthesia for Surgery in Obese Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorTechnische Universität DresdenRan2014 to 2018Enrolled2,013ConditionsMorbid Obesity, Surgery, General AnesthesiaArmsHigher PEEP, Lower PEEP
NCT07639489 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Association of Intraoperative Mechanical Power With Postoperative Pulmonary Complications and Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

TypeobservationalSponsorFusun GozenRan2026 to 2026Enrolled110ConditionsPostoperative Pulmonary Complications, Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery (CABG), Prolonged Mechanical VentilationArmsIntraoperative Mechanical Ventilation Monitoring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Observational
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 10 countries.

Michiel T U SchuijtDepartment of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Liselotte HolDepartment of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sunny G NijbroekDepartment of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sanchit AhujaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pain Management & Perioperative Medicine, & Outcomes Research Consortium Cleveland Clinic, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, The United States of America.
David van MeenenDepartment of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Guido MazzinariDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Sabrine HemmesDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pain Management & Perioperative Medicine, & Outcomes Research Consortium Cleveland Clinic, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, The United States of America.
Thomas BluthDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Pulmonary Engineering Group, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Lorenzo BallDepartment of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Marcelo Gama-de AbreuDepartment of Intensive Care and Resuscitation, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, The United States of America.
Paolo PelosiDepartment of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Marcus J SchultzDepartment of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ary Serpa NetoDepartment of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLCleveland Clinic · USOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITHospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ESMahidol University · THThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: While an association of the intraoperative driving pressure with postoperative pulmonary complications has been described before, it is uncertain whether the intraoperative mechanical power is associated with postoperative pulmonary complications. Methods: Posthoc analysis of two international, multicentre randomised clinical trials (ISRCTN70332574 and NCT02148692) conducted between 2011-2013 and 2014-2018, in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery comparing the effect of two different positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels on postoperative pulmonary complications. Time-weighted average dynamic driving pressure and mechanical power were calculated for individual patients. A multivariable logistic regression model adjusted for confounders was used to assess the independent associations of driving pressure and mechanical power with the occurrence of a composite of postoperative pulmonary complications, the primary endpoint of this posthoc analysis. Findings: In 1191 patients included, postoperative pulmonary complications occurrence was 35.9%. Median time-weighted average driving pressure and mechanical power were 14·0 [11·0-17·0] cmH Interpretation: In this merged cohort of surgery patients, higher intraoperative mechanical power was independently associated with postoperative pulmonary complications. Mechanical power could serve as a summary ventilatory biomarker for the risk for postoperative pulmonary complications in these patients, but our findings need confirmation in other, preferably prospective studies. Funding: The two original studies were supported by unrestricted grants from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and the Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC. For this current analysis, no additional funding was requested. The funding sources had neither a role in the design, collection of data, statistical analysis, interpretation of data, writing of the report, nor in the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Indexed as

Driving pressureIntensity of ventilationIntraoperativeMechanical powerMechanical ventilationPostoperative pulmonary complication

Identifiers

PMID35480074
PMCPMC9035701
OpenAlexW4224144077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.