Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35480071›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2022

Colorectal cancer screening with fecal immunochemical testing or primary colonoscopy: An analysis of health equity based on a randomised trial.

U Strömberg, C Bonander, M Westerberg, L Å Levin, C Metcalfe, R Steele, L Holmberg, A Forsberg, R Hultcrantz

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02078804 (SCREESCO - Screening of Swedish Colons), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02078804 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

SCREESCO - Screening of Swedish Colons

TypeinterventionalSponsorUppsala University HospitalRan2014 to 2030Enrolled278,000ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsColonoscopy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. National cancer screening program for colorectal cancer in Korea.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

U StrömbergSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, PO Box 463, Gothenburg SE-405 30, Sweden.
C BonanderSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, PO Box 463, Gothenburg SE-405 30, Sweden.
M WesterbergDepartment of Mathematics, Uppsala University, Box 480, Uppsala SE-751 06, Sweden.
L Å LevinDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping SE-581 83, Sweden.
C MetcalfeBristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol BS8 2PS, United Kingdom.
R SteeleDepartment of Surgery, Population Health and Genomics, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee DD1 9SY, United Kingdom.
L HolmbergTranslational Oncology and Urology Research (TOUR), School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, St Thomas Street, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom.
A ForsbergDepartment of Medicine K2, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm SE-171 76, Sweden.
R HultcrantzDepartment of Medicine K2, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm SE-171 76, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We have addressed health equity attained by fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) and primary colonoscopy (PCOL), respectively, in the randomised controlled screening trial SCREESCO conducted in Sweden. Methods: We analysed data on the individuals recruited between March 2014, and March 2020, within the study registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02078804. Swedish population registry data on educational level, household income, country of birth, and marital status were linked to each 60-year-old man and woman who had been randomised to two rounds of FIT 2 years apart ( Findings: We found a marked socioeconomic gradient in the colonoscopy attendance proportion in the PCOL arm (adjusted odds ratio [95% credibility interval] between the groups categorised in the highest vs. lowest national quartile for household income: 2·20 [2·01-2·42]) in parallel with the gradient in the Interpretation: The unintended risk of exacerbating inequalities in health by organised colorectal cancer screening may be higher with a PCOL strategy than a FIT strategy, despite parallel socioeconomic gradients in uptake. Funding: This work was supported by the Swedish Cancer Society under Grant 20 0719. CB and US provided economic support from the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working life, and Welfare under Grant 2020-00962.

Indexed as

Cancer preventionColorectal cancerHealth equityPopulationScreening uptakeSocioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID35480071
PMCPMC9035727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.