ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022
Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence System for the Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy in Chinese Community Healthcare Centers.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Approaches in Developing Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2025Pooled it
- The diagnostic accuracy of AI-assisted diabetic retinopathy screening in primary care: a prospective validation study.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2026Article
- REAL-WORLD PRACTICE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEM FOR DIABETIC RETINOPATHY IN TAIWAN.Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2026Article
- Clinical setting-dependent diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence and store-and-forward diabetic retinopathy screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of regulator-approved deep learning systems for fundus diabetic retinopathy detections.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- A Narrative Review of Ethical Issues in the Use of Artificial Intelligence Enabled Diagnostics for Diabetic Retinopathy.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025Review
- Application of artificial intelligence system for screening multiple fundus diseases in Chinese primary healthcare settings: a real-world, multicentre and cross-sectional study of 4795 cases.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Deep learning algorithms to detect diabetic kidney disease from retinal photographs in multiethnic populations with diabetes.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023Article
- The application of artificial intelligence in diabetic retinopathy screening: a Saudi Arabian perspective.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Diagnostic test accuracy of artificial intelligence in screening for referable diabetic retinopathy in real-world settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- Applications of artificial intelligence-assisted retinal imaging in systemic diseases: A literature review.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of a Comprehensive Artificial Intelligence Retinal Expert (CARE) system for detecting diabetic retinopathy (DR) in a Chinese community population. Methods: This was a cross-sectional, diagnostic study. Participants with a previous diagnosis of diabetes from three Chinese community healthcare centers were enrolled in the study. Single-field color fundus photography was obtained and analyzed by the AI system and two ophthalmologists. Primary outcome measures included the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the AI system in detecting DR and diabetic macular edema (DME). Results: In this study, 443 subjects (848 eyes) were enrolled, and 283 (63.88%) were men. The mean age was 52.09 (11.51) years (range 18-82 years); 266 eyes were diagnosed with any DR, 233 with more-than-mild diabetic retinopathy (mtmDR), 112 with vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (vtDR), and 57 with DME. The image ability of the AI system was as high as 99.06%, whereas its sensitivity and specificity varied significantly in detecting DR with different severities. The sensitivity/specificity to detect any DR was 75.19% (95%CI 69.47-80.17)/93.99% (95%CI 91.65-95.71), mtmDR 78.97% (95%CI 73.06-83.90)/92.52% (95%CI 90.07-94.41), vtDR 33.93% (95%CI 25.41-43.56)/97.69% (95%CI 96.25-98.61), and DME 47.37% (95%CI 34.18-60.91)/93.99% (95%CI 91.65-95.71). Conclusions: This multicenter cross-sectional diagnostic study noted the safety and reliability of the CARE system for DR (especially mtmDR) detection in Chinese community healthcare centers. The system may effectively solve the dilemma faced by Chinese community healthcare centers: due to the lack of ophthalmic expertise of primary physicians, DR diagnosis and referral are not timely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.