Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35479949›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence System for the Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy in Chinese Community Healthcare Centers.

Xiuqing Dong, Shaolin Du, Wenkai Zheng, Chusheng Cai, Huaxiu Liu, Jiangfeng Zou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Applications of artificial intelligence-assisted retinal imaging in systemic diseases: A literature review.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiuqing DongDepartment of Ophthalmology, Dongguan Tungwah Hospital, Dongguan, China.
Shaolin DuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Dongguan Tungwah Hospital, Dongguan, China.
Wenkai ZhengDepartment of Ophthalmology, Dongguan Tungwah Hospital, Dongguan, China.
Chusheng CaiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Dongguan Tungwah Hospital, Dongguan, China.
Huaxiu LiuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Dongguan Tungwah Hospital, Dongguan, China.
Jiangfeng ZouDepartment of Ophthalmology, Dongguan Tungwah Hospital, Dongguan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of a Comprehensive Artificial Intelligence Retinal Expert (CARE) system for detecting diabetic retinopathy (DR) in a Chinese community population. Methods: This was a cross-sectional, diagnostic study. Participants with a previous diagnosis of diabetes from three Chinese community healthcare centers were enrolled in the study. Single-field color fundus photography was obtained and analyzed by the AI system and two ophthalmologists. Primary outcome measures included the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the AI system in detecting DR and diabetic macular edema (DME). Results: In this study, 443 subjects (848 eyes) were enrolled, and 283 (63.88%) were men. The mean age was 52.09 (11.51) years (range 18-82 years); 266 eyes were diagnosed with any DR, 233 with more-than-mild diabetic retinopathy (mtmDR), 112 with vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (vtDR), and 57 with DME. The image ability of the AI system was as high as 99.06%, whereas its sensitivity and specificity varied significantly in detecting DR with different severities. The sensitivity/specificity to detect any DR was 75.19% (95%CI 69.47-80.17)/93.99% (95%CI 91.65-95.71), mtmDR 78.97% (95%CI 73.06-83.90)/92.52% (95%CI 90.07-94.41), vtDR 33.93% (95%CI 25.41-43.56)/97.69% (95%CI 96.25-98.61), and DME 47.37% (95%CI 34.18-60.91)/93.99% (95%CI 91.65-95.71). Conclusions: This multicenter cross-sectional diagnostic study noted the safety and reliability of the CARE system for DR (especially mtmDR) detection in Chinese community healthcare centers. The system may effectively solve the dilemma faced by Chinese community healthcare centers: due to the lack of ophthalmic expertise of primary physicians, DR diagnosis and referral are not timely.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecolor fundus photographycommunity healthcarediabetic retinopathysensitivityspecificity

Identifiers

PMID35479949
PMCPMC9035696
OpenAlexW4223553786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.