ArticleRSC advances2021
Chitosan-based enzyme ink for screen-printed bioanodes.
Article in RSC advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microcontact printing of choline oxidase using a polycation-functionalized zwitterionic polymer as enzyme immobilization matrix.The Analyst · 2023Article
- Fully printed and self-compensated bioresorbable electrochemical devices based on galvanic coupling for continuous glucose monitoring.Science advances · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, magnesium oxide (MgO)-templated mesoporous carbon (MgOC) and chitosan cross-linked with genipin (chitosan-genipin) were considered bio-composite inks for screen-printed bioanodes. The fabrication processes were optimized using rheological and structural data, and a bioanode ink containing glucose oxidase (GOx) and 1,2-naphthoquinone (1,2-NQ) was successfully developed. The optimal bioanode-ink contained MgOC pre-treated by washing to achieve a hydrophilic and neutral surface, which helped maintain enzyme activity and resulted in a highly porous electrode structure, which is essential for the accessibility of glucose to GOx. A bioanode fabricated using this ink showed a linear response current dependency up to 8 mM glucose with a sensitivity of 25.83 μA cm
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.