ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2022
Comparison of the Suitability Between NRS2002 and MUST as the First-Step Screening Tool for GLIM Criteria in Hospitalized Patients With GIST.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Global epidemiological characteristics of malnutrition in cancer patients: a comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review.BMC cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Prognostic potential of nutritional risk screening and assessment tools in predicting survival of patients with pancreatic neoplasms: a systematic review.Nutrition journal · 2024Pooled it
- Prevalence of malnutrition based on global leadership initiative in malnutrition criteria for completeness of diagnosis and future risk of malnutrition based on current malnutrition diagnosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Pooled it
- Comparison of nasogastric tube and intermittent oro-esophageal tube feeding in patients with dysphagia and evaluation of an assessment scale for initial nutritional support selection.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Summary of the best evidence for perioperative enteral nutrition management in patients with laryngeal cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Review
- Association Between Malnutrition and Multi-Drug Resistant Bacterial Infections in Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit Patients.Infection and drug resistance · 2025Article
- Nutritional risk, functional decline, and symptom burden in lung cancer: a study based on PG-SGA scores and biochemical data.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Utilizing machine learning approaches to investigate the relationship between cystatin C and serious complications in esophageal cancer patients after esophagectomy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Observational
- Evaluation of different screening tools for detection of malnutrition in hospitalised patients.Journal of clinical nursing · 2024Article
- An Evaluation of the Usefulness of Selected Screening Methods in Assessing the Risk of Malnutrition in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Nutrients · 2024Article
- Article
- Screening and assessment of malnutrition in patients with liver cirrhosis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Review
- The Relationship between Nutritional Risk and the Most Common Chronic Diseases in Hospitalized Geriatric Population from Central Poland.Nutrients · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The Global Leader Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria have been recommended for malnutrition diagnosis recently, for which the first step is malnutrition risk screening with any validated tool. This study aims to investigate the incidence of malnutrition risk in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) inpatients and compare the suitability of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS2002) and Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) as the first-step screening tool for GLIM criteria. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of GIST inpatients in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2019. NRS2002 and MUST were used to screen malnutrition risk at the time of admission. The diagnostic consistency of these two tools with GLIM criteria for malnutrition was analyzed, and the predictive performance of both tools for the length of hospital stay and the occurrence of complications was also evaluated in surgical and non-surgical inpatients. Results: A total of 269 GIST inpatients were included in this study, of which 45.7 and 40.9% were at malnutrition risk determined by NRS2002 and MUST, respectively. In non-surgical inpatients, NRS2002 and MUST had similar diagnostic consistency with GLIM criteria in sensitivity (93.0 vs. 97.7%), specificity (81.1 vs. 81.1%), and Kappa value ( Conclusion: The malnutrition risk is common in GIST inpatients. NRS2002 is more suitable than MUST for the first-step risk screening of the GLIM scheme in non-surgical inpatients, considering its better performance in screening malnutrition risk and predicting clinical outcomes. MUST was found to have good diagnostic consistency with GLIM criteria for malnutrition in both non-surgical and surgical GIST inpatients, and further studies need to be conducted to investigate its predictive performance on clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.