ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2022
Physicochemical Properties and
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Emerging non-thermal processing technologies and their impact on the quality, safety, and bioactive integrity of camel milk: A review article.Food chemistry: X · 2026Review
- Drying-Induced Structural and Oxidative Transformations in Sustainable Proteins: Impact on Physicochemical Properties and Flavor-Binding Functionality.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Impact of High Hydrostatic Pressure on the Physicochemical Characteristics, Functional Properties, Structure, and Bioactivities ofFood science & nutrition · 2025Article
- Ultra-high pressure improved gelation and digestive properties of Tai Lake whitebait myofibrillar protein.Food chemistry: X · 2024Article
- Improvement in the gelling properties of myofibrillar protein from the razor clam (Food chemistry: X · 2023Article
- Heat treatment of quinoa (Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The utilization of myofibrillar proteins (MPs) from the scallop mantle was limited due to its poor digestibility
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.