ArticleAllergologie select2022
State of the art in AIT: The patients' perspective.
Article in Allergologie select, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Studies on allergic diseases and B cells in the past 20 years: a bibliometric analysis via CiteSpace and VOSviewer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOn the occasion of the 110 MATERIALS AND
methodsInformed by questions and feedback provided to MeinAllergiePortal, an online survey with a target of 130 responses was devised and offered for completion by readers. All visitors of MeinAllergiePortal categories addressing inhalant allergies were invited to participate in the survey. Participants were grouped and analyzed by their AIT completion status. The survey was ended once target was met.
results121 of 132 participants were familiar with AIT. 1) A majority of patients who completed AIT would choose the therapy again; 2) Physicians do not seem to discuss AIT with all patients with significant symptoms; 3) Adverse reactions appear to be a major reason why patients terminate AIT prematurely; 4) Lack of time, or early response, as often supposed, does not seem to be a major factor leading to discontinuation of AIT.
conclusionPatients' experience and understanding of symptoms (both related to allergic disease, or expected AIT-related adverse events) appear to be key factors related to AIT engagement and adherence. Given the importance of adherence for AIT efficacy, improved education and support strategies may assist patients achieve their treatment goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.