ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022
The Microbial Quality of Commercial Chopped Romaine Lettuce Before and After the "Use By" Date.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recombinant Lactococcus lactis Expressing Human LL-37 Prevents Deaths from Viral Infections in Piglets and Chicken.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2024Article
- Microbiome-based classification models for fresh produce safety and quality evaluation.Microbiology spectrum · 2024Article
- One Health Perspectives on Food Safety in Minimally Processed Vegetables and Fruits: From Farm to Fork.Microorganisms · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the United States, due to the limited information about the microbial quality and safety of fresh produce after the labeled open dates, unnecessary discarding of fresh produce in good conditions and food loss have been caused. The aim of this study was to address this knowledge gap and evaluate the microbial quality of commercial chopped Romaine lettuce (RL) on the "Use By" dates (UBD) and 5 days after the "Use By" dates (UBD5). The microbial quality was evaluated using culture-dependent and culture-independent methods. Three brands of RL samples, from early and late harvest seasons, were purchased from local grocery stores and stored at 4°C until 5 days after their UBD. On the UBD and UBD5, bagged lettuce was opened, homogenized, diluted, and plated onto plate count agar and anaerobic agar to obtain total aerobic plate counts (APC) and total anaerobic plate counts (AnPC). For the culture-independent method, DNA was extracted from each sample homogenate and used for 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The culture-dependent results showed that there was no significant change in APC or AnPC between UBD and UBD5 samples. The APC and AnPC ranged from 5.71 ± 0.74 to 7.89 ± 0.10 Log CFU/g and 1.75 ± 0.08 to 7.32 ± 0.61 Log CFU/g, respectively. No significant difference in alpha diversity, based on observed features and Shannon index values, was detected between UBD and UBD5 samples using 16S rRNA sequencing. Similarly, no difference was observed in beta diversity based on the Jaccard distance matrixes and the weighted Unifrac distance matrixes. Taxonomic analysis revealed 128 genera in all RL samples. The top five genera were
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.