Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35479260›Full record

ArticleApplied environmental education and communication (Print)2022

Engaged communication of environmental health science: Processes and outcomes of urban academic-community partnerships.

Carrie Leach, N Schroeck, J Blessman, V Rorai, M Cooper-Sargent, P A Lichtenberg, C J Trentacosta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied environmental education and communication (Print), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. [Environmental risks and health literacy: a systematic review].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carrie LeachCenter for Urban Responses to Environmental Stressors, Wayne State University, Detroit, US.
N SchroeckCenter for Urban Responses to Environmental Stressors, Wayne State University, Detroit, US.
J BlessmanCenter for Urban Responses to Environmental Stressors, Wayne State University, Detroit, US.
V RoraiInstitute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, Detroit, US.
M Cooper-SargentEcology Center, Detroit, US.
P A LichtenbergInstitute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, Detroit, US.
C J TrentacostaCenter for Urban Responses to Environmental Stressors, Wayne State University, Detroit, US.

Funding

Pilot Project ProgramP30ES020957 · NIEHS · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI RUNGE-MORRIS, MELISSA A · 2014 to 2021
$10.1M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES020957
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Those who bear the greatest environmental burdens often have the least access to information, and explanations for engaging communities to develop solutions are lacking. We describe, and use a case study to depict, a participatory process of urban academic and community members to co-produce educational and communication tools. Over five years, we interfaced with 763 individuals at eleven events and three times that (n=2,273) through attendees' networks at 109 small group events using snowball methods. The resulting communication tools, paired resources, and mobile dissemination were responsive to residents' circumstances and enhanced their ability to access health protecting information and resources.

Indexed as

community engaged researchcommunity engagementenvironmental health communicationenvironmental health literacyscience communication

Identifiers

PMID35479260
PMCPMC9037758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.