Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35479182›Full record

ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2022

Objective Phenotyping of Root System Architecture Using Image Augmentation and Machine Learning in Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.).

Zhanyou Xu, Larry M York, Anand Seethepalli, Bruna Bucciarelli, Hao Cheng, Deborah A Samac

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Phenotyping Alfalfa (Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Phenotyping ofPlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Explainable deep learning in plant phenotyping.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhanyou XuUSDA-ARS, Plant Science Research Unit, 1991 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7633-036X
Larry M YorkBiosciences Division and Center for Bioenergy Innovation, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1995-9479
Anand SeethepalliNoble Research Institute, LLC, Ardmore, OK 73401, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0937-9128
Bruna BucciarelliDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, 1991 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA.
Hao ChengDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, 2251 Meyer Hall, One Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Deborah A SamacUSDA-ARS, Plant Science Research Unit, 1991 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Active breeding programs specifically for root system architecture (RSA) phenotypes remain rare; however, breeding for branch and taproot types in the perennial crop alfalfa is ongoing. Phenotyping in this and other crops for active RSA breeding has mostly used visual scoring of specific traits or subjective classification into different root types. While image-based methods have been developed, translation to applied breeding is limited. This research is aimed at developing and comparing image-based RSA phenotyping methods using machine and deep learning algorithms for objective classification of 617 root images from mature alfalfa plants collected from the field to support the ongoing breeding efforts. Our results show that unsupervised machine learning tends to incorrectly classify roots into a normal distribution with most lines predicted as the intermediate root type. Encouragingly, random forest and TensorFlow-based neural networks can classify the root types into branch-type, taproot-type, and an intermediate taproot-branch type with 86% accuracy. With image augmentation, the prediction accuracy was improved to 97%. Coupling the predicted root type with its prediction probability will give breeders a confidence level for better decisions to advance the best and exclude the worst lines from their breeding program. This machine and deep learning approach enables accurate classification of the RSA phenotypes for genomic breeding of climate-resilient alfalfa.

Identifiers

PMID35479182
PMCPMC9012978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.