ArticleRSC advances2021
Article in RSC advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.
- Aqueous Two-Phase Bioinks for Discrete Packing and Compartmentalization of 3D Bioprinted Cells.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Exosome-functionalized alginate/gelatin composite scaffolds: synergistic enhancement of osteogenic differentiation for bone tissue engineering.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Research Progress of Cuproptosis in Orthopaedics: Opportunities and Challenges.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Phototunable Gelatin-Based Hydrogels as Cell Scaffolds for Modulating Cell Adhesion on Hydrogel Surfaces.ACS applied bio materials · 2026Article
- Musculoskeletal disorders: does cuproptosis hold the key?Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Tailoring cell behaviour by surface micropatterning and interconnected porous structure of gelatin/nano-silica/PLGA 3D composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering.RSC advances · 2025Article
- Biomimetic Natural Biomaterial Nanocomposite Scaffolds: A Rising Prospect for Bone Replacement.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- The three-dimensional culture of L929 and C2C12 cells based on SPI-SA interpenetrating network hydrogel scaffold with excellent mechanical properties.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Review
- Polymeric Hydrogels for Controlled Drug Delivery to Treat Arthritis.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Hydrogels Classification According to the Physical or Chemical Interactions and as Stimuli-Sensitive Materials.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Porous substrates composed of biodegradable polymers and nanoparticles have found extensive use as three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds to regenerate damaged tissues through the incorporation of cells or growth factors. Here, injectable thermally responsive hydrogels based on SiO
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.